SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(MP) 675

B.M.GUPTA
State of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Ramlakhan Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
R.D. Agrawal, Public Prosecutor for State;
Amit Lahoti, R.K. Sharma and Y.S. Tomar for respondents.

ORDER

1. All these three petitions are arising out of one common order, hence as agreed to by all the parties, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

2. The facts of the case of prosecution, as per the FIR are, that during intervening night of 5th and 6th August 2001 at about 1:00 am., Ramlal Kaul, CJM Vidisha (hereinafter referred as the deceased) was admitted in District Hospital Vidisha. He was feeling severe pain in his chest. He was attended by his son Ravindra Kaul and Priyadarshan Sharma, JMFC. Accused Dr. Ramlakhan Singh was on duty, who attended the deceased. During treatment he put oxygen mask on the face of the deceased. Immediately after putting the mask, deceased started feeling restlessness, which was reported by Ravindra Kaul to the doctor, on which Dr. Ramlakhan Singh checked the gas cylinder and found the same as empty. Immediatel y he removed the mask from the face. During that time, another doctor Bansal came and after examining the deceased declared him as dead. During treatment this accused Dr. Ramlakhan Singh sent calls to call Medical Specialist Dr. Bagrecha. When he could not be available, he sent further calls to accus

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top