SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(MP) 791

N.K.MODY
Anwar Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Tausif warsi for petitioners; G.S.Chouhan, Government Advocate for State.

ORDER

1. Being aggrieved by the order dated 20.7.2009 passed by VI ASJ, Fast Track Court, Mandsaur in S.T.No.6812009 whereby charges were framed against the petitioner u/s. 148,341/149,307/149,323/149 and 506 IPC, the present petition has been filed.

2. In short the case of prosecution was that on 23/12/2008 at about 12.15 p.m. complainant Ranjeetsingh Rajput lodged a complaint against the petitioners who are 13 in number at P.S. Sitamau, Mandsaur to the effect that Yashpal Singh cousin of the complainant is having a boring machine. It was alleged in the complaint that Bhawarlal, Nathmaharaj, Baluram, Prabhulal went with the machine at village Chikla. In the village, another machine which is owned by petitioner No.9 was carrying the boring. It was further alleged that petitioner No.9 asked Prabhulal that in village Chikla, only the machine which is owned by petitioner No.9 shall operate and they cannot operate the machine in the village. It was alleged that at about 8.00 p.m. all the persons of complainant party went to talk with petitioner No.9. It was further alleged that at that time petitioner No.9 attacked the complainant party along with his 25 companions who were armed wit








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top