SUSHMA SHRIVASTAVA, K.K.LAHOTI
Manish – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
1. This petition is directed against order dated 15.4.2008 by District Magistrate, Seoni in Criminal Case No. 17/2003 by which the petitioner No.1 was externed under Sections 5,6 and 12 of the M.P. Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 (hereinafterreferred to as 'Adhiniyam' for short).
2. Learned counsel for petitioners submitted that the Collector, Seoni vide order dated 26.2.2008 called a report in respect of activities of petitioner No.1 from Superintendent of Police, Seoni. The aforesaid information was furnished to the District Magistrate, Seoni by the Superintendent of Police on 27.3.2008 and the Collector, Seoni while passing order (Annexure P-l) took into consideration the aforesaid report in Paras 7 and 8 of the impugned order. It was submitted. that without extending an opportunity to explain the aforesaid circumstances appearing in the report, the order was passed by which the petitioner No.1 was externed vide order Annexure P-l for a period of one year. The petitioner preferred an appeal before the Commissioner, Jabalpur Division, but vide order Annexure P-2 it was dismissed. It was submitted that the order (Annexure P-l) which has been passed without following the pr
1. Nawabkhan Abbaskhan v. The State of Gujrat, = (1974) 2 SCC 121
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.