SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(MP) 541

B.M.GUPTA, DIPAK MISRA
Usha Shanna – Appellant
Versus
Maharaj Kishan Raina – Respondent


Advocates:
D.D. Bansal for petitioner; Vivek Khedkar for respondents No.1.

ORDER

Gupta J. -- 1. Feeling aggrieved with an order dated 15.01.2008 passed by 1 the Additional District Judge, Gwalior in Civil Suit No. 2A/06, whereby learned Judge has rejected an application dated 23.10.2007 filed on behalf of the petitioner/plaintiff under section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act requesting therein to permit her to get the disputed signatures of Balasaheb Paradkar examined by a hand writing expert, this petition has been preferred by the petitioner.

2. On perusal of the impugned order, it appears that with regard to same disputed signatures (on Ex. P/9 & Ex.P115) an application filed earlier by opposite party-respondent No. 1/ defendant was allowed and the report of the hand writing expert of the opposite party filed, is on record. After considering the report against the interest of the petitioner, she has also applied to provide same opportunity to her in rebuttal. The present application has been disputed by the opposite party-respondents herein. The learned Judge while passing the impugned order has observed that there is already one report of the hand writing expert available on record, hence, permitting again for seeking second report of the different












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top