SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(MP) 132

RAJENDRA MENON
Kalpana Karatkar – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Akshay Dharamadhikari for petitioner;
S.S. Bisen for respondents.

ORDER

1. Challening the order Annexure P-5 dated 24.12.1998 passed by the Director, Adim Jaati Anusandhan Sansthaan, Bhopal terminating the services of the petitioner and the findings recorded by the High Power Committee vide Annexure P-9 dated 12.3.2003 petitioner has filed this petition.

2. Petitioner claims to be a person belonging to caste 'Dhobi' by birth, which is notified as Scheduled Caste in the District of Bhopal, under Appendix I Part IX to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Orders, 1976 at serial No.22 in the Districts of Bhopal, Raisen and Sehore. Claiming herself to be a person staying in Bhopal after her forefathers had migrated in the year 1949 petitioner sought appropriate certificate from the competent authority. The Tahsildar concerned in the year 1992 granted certificate to the petitioner after due enquiry vide Annexure P-l on 22.9.1993 declaring the petitioner to be a person belonging to 'Dhobi' community, a scheduled caste person.

3. Based on the aforesaid certificate and taking advantage of the reservation policy, petitioner sought appointment on the post of Stenographer/Typist in Adim Jaati Anusandhan Sansthan, Bhopal and she was appointed vide or
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top