2010 Supreme(MP) 179
(SUPREME COURT)
R.V. Raveendran and Aftab Alam, JJ.
Indore Municipal Corporation and another v.
Dr. Hemlata and others
Civil Appeal No.5031 of 2005 : against the judgment of
M.P. High Court, passed in Letters Patent Appeal No. 297 of 2001;
Decided on 24.2.2010.
Shyam Divan with Sudarsh Menon for appellants;
C.A. Sundaram with Vivek Tankha with Abhay Kumar, Sushil Kumar Jain and Ms. Pratibha Jain for respondents.
Headnote:Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984 (M.P.) -- Rr.56(6), 14 and 62(a) -- M.P. Municipal Corporation Act, 1956 --S.299 -- provisions under R.56(1) to (3) -- not applicable to residential buildings -- R.56(6) provides in respect of building above 10 M. open space -- joint inspection of Corporation and Land Development Department carried out approving construction - no show cause notice can be given thereafter.
The Town Planning Department granted the planning permission requiring the respondents to leave margin open space of 3 m. on the Eastern and Western sides, 6 m. on the Northern side an open space as required by the rules on the Southern side vide the planning permission dated 7.2.1995 as amended by order dated 31.5.1997. Rule 56 of the Rules deals with exterior open spaces. Subd`rules (1), (2) and (3) deal with residential buildings. Subd`rule (5) provides that the open spaces mentioned in subd`rules (1) to (3) shall apply to residential buildings, up to a height of 10 m. The building of the respondents is a residential-cum-commercial building of the height of 12 m. Therefore, the provisions of subd`rules (1) to (3) of rule 56 will not apply. Subd`rule (6) of rule 56 provides that in respect of all buildings of a height of above 10m., the open spaces on the sides and the rear, shall be as given in Table 5 and spaces shall be governed by rule 62(a), depending upon the height of the building. Table 5 requires that in regard to buildings of a height of more than 10 m. (but less than 15 m.) the margin open space to be left around the building, except on the front side, shall be 3 m. It is evident from the order dated 31.5.1997 of the Joint Director that it had sanctioned marginal open space on the Western side as 3 m. As the Southern side will be the front of the building (facing M.G. Road) and the Western side will be one of the sides of the building, the margin on that side should be only 3 m. It is thus seen that the margin open space required to be left on the Western side both under the rules and as per the sanction granted by the Town and Country Planning Department and the Municipal Corporation was only 3 m. The assumption of the appellants that if any doors are opened on the western side, the Western side will become the front side of the building and in that event, there should be 4.5 m. setback on that side, is without basis. Similarly the assumption of the appellants that if the Western side should be treated as one of the sides of the building and not the front, there cannot be any doorways on that side is also equally baseless.
The property has roads on two sides that is, on the South and the West. The sanctioning authority had accepted that the frontage is to the South and in fact require that there should not be any construction to a depth of 75 ft. on the Southern side, which has been complied with. The rules do not contain any provision that the entrances or doors should be only on the front side or that there cannot be any entrances on other sides. In fact, rule 14 provides that no permission shall be required for opening any doors on any side. Therefore, the insistence by the Municipal Corporation that the open margin space on the Western side should be 4.5 m. nor require that no door or shutter on the Western side of the building, is not in pursuance of the Rules and in fact, unreasonable. It follows, therefore, that the order dated 11.4.2000 directing the respondents to close all doors on the Western side and to construct a compound wall on the Western side, is wholly unauthorised, arbitrary and unreasonable. [Paras 10 & 11
Hkwfe fodkl fu;e] 1984 ¼e-Á-½ && fu-56¼6½] 14 rFkk 62¼d½ && e-iz- uxjikfyd fuxe vf/kfu;e] 1956 && /kkjk 299 && fu-56¼1½ ls ¼3½ ds v/khu mica/k && vkokfld Hkouksa ij ykxw ugha && fu-56¼6½ 10 eh- ds Åij [kqys LFkku ds Hkou ds laca/k esa mica/k djrk gS && fuxe rFkk Hkwfe fodkl foHkkx dk la;qDr fujh{k.k dj fuekZ.k dk vuqeksnu fd;k x;k && rRi‘pkr~ dkj.k crkvks lwpuk ugha nh tk ldrhA
uxj ;kstuk foHkkx us vkns‘k fnukad 31-5-1997 }kjk ;Fkk la‘kksf/kr ;kstuk vuqKk }kjk izR;FkhZx.k ls 3 eh- dk ekftZu [kqyk LFkku iwoZ rFkk if‘pe dh vksj] 6 eh- mRrj dh vksj rFkk fu;eksa }kjk ;Fkk visf{kr [kqyk LFkku nf{k.k dh vksj NksM+us dh vis{kk djrh gqbZ ;kstuk vuqKk fnukad 7-2-1995 iznku dhA fu;eksa dk fu;e 56 ckgjh [kqys LFkkuksa ls lacaf/kr gSA mifu;e ¼1½] ¼2½ rFkk ¼3½ vkokfld Hkouksa ds ckjs esa gSA mifu;e ¼5½ micaf/kr djrk gS fd mifu;e ¼1½ ls ¼3½ esa mfYyf[kr [kqys LFkku 10 eh- dh Å¡pkbZ rd vkokfld Hkouksa ds fy, ykxw gksaxsA izR;FkhZx.k dk Hkou 12 eh- dh Å¡pkbZ dk vkokfld&lfgr&okf.kfTd Hkou gSA blfy,] fu;e 56 ds mifu;e ¼1½ ls ¼3½ ds mica/k ykxw ugha gksaxsA fu;e 56 dk mifu;e ¼6½ mica/k djrk gS fd 10 eh- ds Åij dh Å¡pkbZ ds lHkh Hkouksa ds laca/k esa] fdukjksa rFkk ihNs dh vksj [kqyk LFkku rkfydk 5 esa fn, x, ds vuqlkj gksaxs rFkk Hkou dh Å¡pkbZ ij fuHkZj djrs gq, LFkku fu;e 62¼d½ }kjk fofu;fer fd, tk,¡xsA rkfydk 5 esa visf{kr gS fd 10 eh- ls vf/kd ¼ijarq 15 eh- ls de½ Å¡pkbZ ds Hkouksa ds laca/k esa Hkou ds pkjksa vksj ekftZu [kqyk LFkku] lkeus dh rjQ ds flok; NksM+k tkus okyk 3 eh- gksxkA la;qDr funsZ‘kd ds vkns‘k fnukad 31-5-1997 ls Li"V gS fd blesa if‘pe dh vksj lhekorhZ [kqyk LFkku 3 eh- eatwj fd;k x;k FkkA D;ksafd nf{k.k dh vksj Hkou dk vxzHkkx ¼,e-th- jksM ds lkeus½ gksxk rFkk if‘pe dh vksj Hkou ds ik‘oksZ esa ls ,d gksxk] ml vksj eftZu ek= 3 eh- gksuk pkfg,A bl izdkj ;g ns[kk x;k fd if‘pe dh vksj NksM+k tkus ds fy, visf{kr ekftZu [kqyk LFkku nksuksa izdkj ls fu;eksa ds v/khu rFkk uxj rFkk xzke ;kstuk foHkkx rFkk uxjikfyd fuxe }kjk nh xbZ eatwjh ds vuqlkj ek= 3 eh- FkkA vihykFkhZx.k dh ;g /kkj.kk fd ;fn dksbZ njokts if‘pe dh vksj [kksys tkrs gSa] if‘pe dh vksj Hkou dk vxzHkkx gksxk rFkk ml fLFkfr esa] ml vksj 4-5 eh- ihNs gksuk pkfg,] fujk/kkj gSA blh izdkj vihykFkhZx.k dh ;g /kkj.kk Hkh fd ;fn if‘pe dh vksj dks Hkou ds ik‘oksZ esa ls ,d u fd vxzHkkx ekuk tk,] ml vksj dksbZ }kj ugha gks ldrs] leku :i ls vk/kkjghu gSA
laifRr ds nkuksa vksj vFkkZr~ nf{k.k rFkk if‘pe esa lM+d gSA eatwjh izkf/kdkjh us Lohdkj fd;k Fkk fd vxzHkkx nf{k.k esa gS rFkk okLro esa vis{kk dh Fkh fd nf{k.k dh vksj 75 QhV dh xgjkbZ rd dksbZ fuekZ.k ugha gksuk pkfg,] ftldk vuqikyu fd;k x;kA fu;eksa esa ,slk dksbZ mica/k varfoZ"V ugha gS fd izos‘k&}kj rFkk njokts ek= lkeus dh vksj gh gksus pkfg, ;k fd vU; vksj dksbZ izos‘k&}kj ugha gks ldrsA okLro esa] fu;e 14 mica/k djrk gS fd fdlh vksj dksbZ njokts [kksyus ds fy, vuqkk visf{kr ugha gksxhA blfy,] uxjikfyd fuxe }kjk vkxzg fd if‘pe dh vksj [kqyk ekftZu LFkku 4-5 eh- gksuk pkfg, rFkk vis{kk fd Hkou dh if‘pe dh vksj dksbZ njoktk ;k "kVj ugha gks] fu;eksa ds vuqlj.k esa ugha gS rFkk okLro esa] v;qfDr;qDr gSA blfy, fu"d"kZ ;g gS fd izR;FkhZx.k dks if‘pe dh vksj lHkh njokts can djus dk rFkk if‘pe dh vksj vgkrk nhokj ds ?ksjs dk fuekZ.k djus dk funsZ‘k nsrk gqvk vkns‘k fnukad 11-4-2000 iw.kZ :i ls vizkf/kd`r] euekuk rFkk v;qfDr;qDr gSA ¼iSjk 10 ,oa 11
Raveendran, J. -- 1. The respondents are the owners of property bearing khasra No.92/2 and 93 of Palasiahana (within the Municipal limits of Indore City) measuring about 0.441 hectares or 3601.4 sq.m. Mohan Lal Khimati and three others, who were originally the owners, made an application for grant of permission for development of the said land by construction of a residential-cum-commercial building, to the Town and Country Planning Department, Indore Division. The Joint Director, Town and Country Planning, by order dated 7.2.2005, granted permission in regard to the building plan for residential-cum-commercial purposes subject to approval of the said building plans by the Indore Municipal Corporation ('Corporation', for short) subject to the following conditions:
(i) The land can be used for residential-cum-commercial use, if Municipal Corporation approves the building plans.
(ii) The ground coverage area (covered area) will be 33% of the land area; and the floor area ratio will be 1.5.
(iii) The height of the building will not be more than 12.0 M.
(iv) Space for parking should be provided as per the ratio specified I in Land Development Rules with reference to the floor area of t construction
(v) Open Margin Space should be provided as per development Rules, that is 4.5 M. on the front (Western) side, 3 M. on the East, 6 metres on the North and on the South (Mahatma Gandhi Road).
1.1 Thereafter, on 21.2.1995 the Municipal Corporation granted permission for commercial use by construction and development of the said land as per the building maps.
2. In pursuance of it, development and construction work was commenced on 30.5.1997. By communication dated 31.5.1997, the Joint Director, Town and Country Planning, amended condition No.(v) of the permission letter dated 7.2.1995 by confirming that the Department had no objection for the construction being made with the front side of the building being on the M.G. Road (that is southern side), and consequently leave a marginal open space of only 3 M. on the western side. The said communication also mentioned that having regard to rule 56(6) of Land Development Rules and Table 5 thereunder, for building of a height of more than 10 M. (but less than 15 M.), the open space on both sides and at the rear should be 3 M. and therefore, the department had no objection for modifying the approval of the building plan by keeping the margin space on the western side (that is on the fifty six shops road) as 3 M. The Municipal Corporation by its letter dated 7.6.1997 granted permission to proceed with the construction work as per Dakhla No.613 dated 13.5.1997 making it clear that there will be no construction upto a depth of 75 feet from M.G. Road front. When the building construction reached plinth level, a notice dated 10.6.1998 was given by the owners for inspection of building. Accordingly, a joint inspection was conducted by the Joint Director, Town and Country Planning and the Building Officer of the Municipal Corporation on 13.11.1998. Their report in regard to such inspection submitted to the Municipal Corporation and the Director of Town and Country Planning confirmed that there was no objection for the setback area on the western side (on the side of fifty six shops road) being reduce to 3 M, in accordance with rule 56(6). The report also recorded that the margin open space (setbacks) were as under:
S.No. Direction As per sanction On the spot
1. On the North 6.0 Mtrs. 6.0 Mtrs.
2. On the South 23.0 Mtrs. (23+12) 35.0 Mtrs.
3. On the West 3.0 Mtrs. 3.0 Mtrs.
4. On the East 3.0 Mtrs. 3.05 Mtrs.
3. On 5.3.1999, the respondents notified the Municipal Corporation that the structure was completed and requested for a service certificate to enable them to apply for service connections. At that stage, the Building Officer issued a show cause notice dated 13.4.1999 and 24.4.1999 to the respondents alleging the following irregularities/violations in c