SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(MP) 162

Shantanu Kemkar, J.K.MAHESHWARI
Bhaiya @ Bhaiyalal @ Arvind – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Ajay Bagadia for petitioner;
M.S. Dwivedi, Panel Lawyer for respondent.

ORDER

Maheshwari, J. -- 1. Assailing the order dated 28.7.2012, Annexure P-3 passed by respondent No.2 and the order dated 21.9.2012, Annexure P-7 passed by respondent No.1 confirming the order of detention, this petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

2. It is the contention of the petitioner that on 24.7.2012, a first information report was lodged against him upon which an offence under sections 294, 323, 506 and 34 of IPC was registered at about 22:50 hours. On the next date, i.e., 25.7.2012, five other reports of petty offences were registered in between 11:15 hours and 15 hours in one day. The Superintendent of Police relying upon FIRs submitted a report before the District Magistrate on 27.7.2012. Thereupon, the order of detention was passed on 28.7.2012 directing to keep the petitioner into custody in Central Jail, Rewa. The petitioner has submitted two representations through his mother. The first representation dated 8.8.2012 has been submitted to the detaining authority i.e. District Magistrate and another representation was submitted to State Government on 9.8.2012. The representation submitted to the State Government was decided on 2.1.2013






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top