SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(MP) 487

A.K.Shrivastava
Arvind Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Punjab National Bank – Respondent


Advocates:
Umesh Trivedi for applicant.

ORDER

1. This is an application under section 482 of CrPC for the quashment of complaint case No.533/2008 registered under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short “Act of 1881”) against the applicant filed on behalf of respondent Punjab National Bank Branch Hoshangabad (hereinafter referred to as “Bank”).

2. Indeed the respondent-Bank filed a complaint under section 138 of the Act of 1881 against the applicant arraying him as an accused with an averment that he took a loan of Rs. 5.50 lac on 7.10.2002 and was obliged to deposit monthly installments which he failed to deposit. On 14.2.2008 the applicant-accused issued a cheque in favour of Bank worth Rs. 3.50 lac but the same was dishonoured on account of want of funds. Eventually a notice under section 138 of the Act of 1881 was sent by the Bank on 18.2.2008 to the accused-applicant making demand of the debt. Despite the said notice was received by the accused-applicant, he failed to deposit the requisite payment. Hence, the complaint has been filed.

3. Learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Hoshangabad registered the case and issued summons to the applicant. Hence, this application under section 482 of CrPC has











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top