SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(MP) 503

Ajit Singh, B.D.Rathi
Omprakash – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Ms. Neeta Kasar for appellant; Sudeep Deb, Government Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER

Rathi, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred under section 383 read with section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short “the Code”) being aggrieved with the judgment dated 15.7.1999 passed by Special Judge, Shahdol in Sessions Trial No.135/97, whereby appellant has been convicted under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (for short “the IPC”) and sentenced to imprisonment for life.

2. It is not in dispute that Mahesh (since deceased) was working in a Hotel at Village Ghunghuti with Bachhu (PW 5) for the last 10 years.

3. Prosecution case, in brief, is that against the backdrop of a recent quarrel, on 20.5.1997, appellant informed Bachhu at his Hotel, that he will kill Mahesh and after a while, in the evening, Parvati (PW 1) came at the Hotel and informed Bachhu that Mahesh was brutally assaulted by the appellant with a cricket Bat. Bachhu rushed to the spot and saw that Mahesh was lying on a cot in a severely injured condition and was breathing sparsely. While he was taking Mahesh to Police Station, near the Hotel, Mahesh succumbed to the injuries thus caused. Thereafter, at 7.30 a.m. First Information Report (Ex. P/4) was lodged by Bachhu at Kotwali Shahdol, whereu



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top