SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(MP) 325

A.K.Shrivastava, B.D.Rathi
Badam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
R.K. Sharma for appellants;
B.K. Sharma for respondent.

JUDGMENT

Rathi, J. -- 1. This criminal appeal has been preferred under section 374 CrP.C on 11.04.2000 being aggrieved from the judgment and sentence passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Sabalgarh (Shri Ajeet Kapoor) in S.T. No.222/1998 on 23.03.2000, whereby every appellant-accused has been convicted under sections 302/34, 450, 307/34, 326/34 and 324/34 of IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment along with fine of Rs.1000/- under section 302/34 IPC, five years rigorous imprisonment along with fine of Rs.1000/- under section 450 IPC, five years rigorous imprisonment along with fine of Rs.1000/- under section 304/34 IPC, four years RI along with fine of Rs.1000/- under section 326/34 and two years RI under section 324/34 IPC separately for each accused. In default of fine six months additional RI has also been imposed. It was also ordered that all the sentences will run concurrently. The accused Urmila Bai and Rekha Bai both were acquitted from all the charges.

2. According to the prosecution case, 15 days prior to the date of incident i.e. on 13.5.1998 accused Badam Singh went to the house of complainant Matadeen to purchase earthen pot. Due to the non-availability of abovementioned e



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top