SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(MP) 118

A.K.Shrivastava
Mumtazul Karim – Appellant
Versus
Vikarun Nisha – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Shri Adil Usmani, for the appellant.
None for the respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. This first appeal under Section 96 C.P.C. has been filed by defendant against judgment and decree of divorce dated 08.03.1996, passed by learned District Judge, Seoni in C.S. No.11-A/1993.

2. In brief, the case of plaintiff-respondent is that her husband (defendant) is Sunni Musalman and similarly she too is Summi Musalman and are being governed by Hanfi law. In Muslim Community, the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 (in short the Act of 1939) is applicable. The marriage between plaintiff and defendant took place on 23.05.1982 and both of them lived together few days earlier to 05.06.1987 but with effect from 05.06.1987, they are residing separately. It is also the case of the plaintiff that a daughter has been born out of their wed-lock and whose name is Shahnaz Bano. Further it has been pleaded that in the year 1990 defendant has solemnized a second marriage in village Chidi, Tahsil Lakhnadon on 16.07.1990. The plaintiff through her counsel sent a notice to the defendant to make payment of Mehar and the said notice was replied by defendant on 31.07.1990. All these facts are not disputed.

3. As per the case of plaintiff, after six months of her marriage, the mo

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top