SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(MP) 789

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
G.S. AHLUWALIA, J.
Govind Lodhi - Appellant
Versus
The State of Madhya Pradesh and Others - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 25471 of 2024
Decided On : 05-09-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Brijendra Swaroop Sahu
For the Respondent: Mohan Sausarkar

Children are legally required to maintain their parents irrespective of property distribution; disputes over property do not absolve this financial obligation.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 - Petitioner sought to quash an order determining maintenance liability towards mother - The petitioner contended that he had not received property and thus should not bear maintenance payment - Court reaffirmed that the duty to maintain parents is independent of property distribution, holding that maintenance of Rs.8,000/- monthly was justifiable. (Paras 1-8)

(B) Legal Responsibility - Children are obligated to maintain their parents irrespective of property allocation - Remedies for property disputes lie within civil litigation, not maintenance claims. (Paras 7-8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged the maintenance order set by the Additional Collector, reversing a prior order and establishing liability for monthly payments of Rs.2,000/- by each son towards their mother’s maintenance.

Findings of Court:
The court found the maintenance amount reasonable given economic conditions and upheld the obligation of children to support their parent regardless of property distribution.

Issues: Main issues addressed included the obligation of children to maintain their parents and the appropriateness of the maintenance amount.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that parental support is a fundamental obligation, distinct from property rights, emphasizing the necessity for children to ensure financial support.

Result: Petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. petition filed for maintenance relief. (Para 1)
2. order by additional collector on maintenance appeal. (Para 2 , 4)
3. claims regarding distribution of land and maintenance. (Para 3)
4. petitioner's argument on property distribution. (Para 5)
5. maintenance obligation emphasized regardless of property. (Para 6)
6. court's view on maintenance liability of children. (Para 7)
7. court's determination on maintenance amount. (Para 8 , 9)
8. petition dismissed. (Para 10)

ORDER :

1. This petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking following relief(s):-

1. It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari to quash or set aside impugned order dated 15.06.2023 vide Annexure P/1 passed by the respondent No.1 to the extent of liability of the petitioner for payment of amount of maintenance to applicant Hakki Bai, in the interest of justice.

2. It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus whereby the amount maintenance for livelihood of Hakki Bai would be recovered from her three sons i.e. respondent No.3 and respondent No.5 and 6, in the interest of justice.

3. It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the relevant record pertaining to case of the petitioner for bare perusal of this Hon’ble Court.

4. Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case including cost of the litigation may kindly be awarded in favour of the petitioner.

2. It is submit ted by counsel for petitioner that Additional Collector, Narsinghpur by order dated 15/06/2023 passed in case No.1/Appeal/Year 2023-24 has affirmed with modification the order dated 09/03/2023 passed by SDO Gadarwara/ Tribunal in revenue case No.690/B-121/2022-23, by which the application filed by respondent No.4 / Smt. Hakki Bai under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (in short ‘Act 2007’) has been allowed.

3. It is submitted by counsel for petitioner that Smt. Hakki Bai filed an application under Section 16 of Act, 2007 against the petitioner and her other sons. It was her contention that she had distributed the land to her sons by executing separate sale-deeds and her sons had promised that they would maintain her, but now they are not making payment of the same. Accordingly, by order dated 09/03/2023, SDO Gadarwara directed for payment of Rs.3,000/- per month by each of her sons, in all Rs.12,000/- per month

4. Being aggrieved by the said order, petitioner preferred an Appeal and Additional Collector, Narsinghpur passed the order dated 15/06/2023 by which the maintenance amount of Rs.3,000/- per month payable by each of the sons including petitioner and respondents No.3, 5 & 6 has been reduced to Rs.2,000/- per month.

5. Challenging the orders passed by Courts below, it is submitted by counsel for petitioner that 8 acres of land was divided by Smt. Hakki Bai amongst her three sons and not a single piece of land was given to petitioner by his mother Smt. Hakki Bai. Therefore, he is not liable to make payment of maintenance to her. His elder brother Kashiram has also given an affidavit to the effect that in the year 2017 his mother had given 1 ½ acres of land to her son Netraj and grandson Chandrakant by executing sale-deed. It is submitted that since the mother of petitioner has not given even the smallest piece of land to him and his financial condition is not such to bear the expenses of his mother, therefore order dated 09/03/2023 passed by SDO Gadarwara be set aside.

6. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

7. The question of payment of maintenance to parents is not dependent upon the fact that how much property has been given to the children. It is the duty of children to maintain their parents. If petitioner is aggrieved by unequal distribution of land, then he has remedy to file a Civil Suit but he cannot run awa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top