IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR
ASHISH SHROTI, J
Dinakar Shukla – Appellant
Versus
State Of M.P. & Ors. – Respondent
WRIT PETITION No. 13766 of 2023, 13765 of 2023, 13768 of 2023, 13815 of 2023, 13822 of 2023, 13831 of 2023, 13834 of 2023, 13838 of 2023, 13985 of 2023, 14174 of 2023, 14179 of 2023, 14586 of 2023, 14590 of 2023, 14681 of 2023, 14685 of 2023, 14790 of 2023, 14793 of 2023, 14856 of 2023, 19403 of 2023, 20839 of 2023, 21268 of 2023, 28904 of 2023, 5583 of 2024, 30720 of 2024
Decided On : 19-08-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenged order regarding disability certificate. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. process of appointment and verification of disability certificates. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. consideration of principles of natural justice. (Para 10 , 12 , 13 , 27 , 29) |
| 4. verification and registration of disability certificates. (Para 11 , 16 , 19 , 21) |
| 5. liberty granted for re-examination of certificates. (Para 31 , 32 , 33) |
ORDER :
The petitioners in this batch of writ petitions are aggrieved by the order passed by the office of Commissioner, Public Instructions, Bhopal, whereby their appointment on the post of Madhyamik/Prathmik Shikshak has been cancelled on account of their disability certificate being found forged and invalid. Since, the issue involved in all these petitions is common, the same are being decided by this common order and for convenience sake, the facts are taken from W.P. No.13766/2023 filed by Mr. Dinkar Shukla.
2. The petitioner has invoked Article 226 of Constitution of India, being aggrieved by the order, dated 14.06.2023, (Annexure P/1) passed by respondent no.2- Joint Director, Public Instructions, Gwalior, whereby his appointment on the post of Madhyamik Shikshak (English) has been cancelled on the ground that his disability certificate has been found to be forged and fabricated.
3. The facts necessary for decision of this case are that the School Education Department of Government of Madhya Pradesh intended to fill up posts of Madhyamik Shikshak in various faculties under Rule 5(4) of M.P. School Education Service (Teaching Cadre), Service Conditions & Recruitment Rules, 2018. The Professional Examination Board initiated recruitment process for conducting eligibility test by issuing advertisement, dated 30.12.2019. The petitioner submitted his candidature for appointment on the post of Madhyamik Shikshak in English Subject as a Physically Handicap (in short ‘PH’) candidate. It be noted here that the petitioner claims to be 45% Partially Deaf and has relied upon a disability certificate brought on record as Annexure P/4.
4. The petitioner successfully participated in the eligibility test and vide order, dated 06.10.2021, (Annexure P/2), he was appointed on the post of Madhyamik Shikshak (English). He was given posting in Government Middle School, Bichpuri, District Sheopur. From reading the appointment order, it is gathered that the appointment order was issued after verification of documents. However, the appointed candidate was required to produce the original document with three self-attested copies thereof before the District Education Officer which also included disability certificate for candidates who are appointed under PH category. The petitioner accordingly produced the document before DEO, Sheopur, which were found genuine after verification as is evident from memo, dated 08.10.2021, (Annexure P/3). The petitioner accordingly joined the service and started working.
5. It is gathered from the reply filed by respondents that some complaints were received with regard to disability certificates being relied upon by various candidates in district Ashok Nagar, Chhatarpur, Guna, Katni, Morena, Sagar, Sheopur, Shivpuri, Sidhi, Singrauli, Ujjain & Umariya. Taking cognizance of complaints, enquiry into the allegations was directed. The Collector, Morena, got the petitioner’s disability certificate verified from Civil Surgeon, District Hospital, Morena, who vide memo, dated 12.05.2023, informed that the disability certificates of as many as 77 candidates, including the petitioner, has not been found registered in disability register. Based upon this report, the Collector, Morena, submitted his report to office of Commissioner, Public Instructions vide memo, dated 15.05.2023, reporting that the disability certificates are forged & fabricated. Consequently, vide impugned order, dated 14.06.2023, (Annexure P/1) the petitioner’s appointment has been cancelled having been obtained on the basis of forged disability certificate.
6.
AI
Disability certificates must be registered to ensure authenticity; non-compliance renders them invalid. Principles of natural justice may not apply if evidence overwhelmingly supports the conclusion ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the need for vigilance and proper identification of persons with disabilities, emphasizing the rights and empowerment of persons with disabiliti....
The statutory disability certificate issued under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act prevails over general medical assessments, ensuring the rights of individuals with disabilities in public....
Once a disability certificate is accepted for employment, it cannot be questioned later based solely on administrative errors, unless fraud is proven.
Verification of disability certificates for employment must be justified, and previous certifications should not be disregarded without legitimate grounds.
The court affirmed the importance of valid disability certificates and the necessity of adhering to established benchmarks for disability in employment decisions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.