SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 291

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR
ASHISH SHROTI, J
Dinakar Shukla – Appellant 
Versus
State Of M.P. & Ors. – Respondent 
WRIT PETITION No. 13766 of 2023, 13765 of 2023, 13768 of 2023, 13815 of 2023, 13822 of 2023, 13831 of 2023, 13834 of 2023, 13838 of 2023, 13985 of 2023, 14174 of 2023, 14179 of 2023, 14586 of 2023, 14590 of 2023, 14681 of 2023, 14685 of 2023, 14790 of 2023, 14793 of 2023, 14856 of 2023, 19403 of 2023, 20839 of 2023, 21268 of 2023, 28904 of 2023, 5583 of 2024, 30720 of 2024
Decided On :  19-08-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Shri MPS Raguvanshi, Senior Advocate with Shri Manish Gurjar- Advocate for the petitioner
For the Respondent:Shri Yogesh Parashar-GA for the respondents/State.

Disability certificates must be registered to ensure authenticity; non-compliance renders them invalid. Principles of natural justice may not apply if evidence overwhelmingly supports the conclusion of invalidity.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 - Sections 57 and 58 - Disability certificates found forged and not registered in the disability register - Appointment of petitioners as Madhyamik Shikshak was cancelled - Legal requirement for registration of disability certificates was not followed - Compliance with principles of natural justice not ensured; however, unnecessary given the justified findings. (Paras 11, 12, 20, 30)

(B) Validity of Documents - Necessity of proper verification of documents before cancellation of appointment due to found irregularities - Non-registration of certificates raises serious doubts; invalidation of certificates upheld. (Paras 19, 27, 34)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners challenged the cancellation of their Madhyamik Shikshak appointments after disability certificates were found forged upon verification initiated due to complaints. The initial verification before hiring was deemed insufficient. (Paras 2, 5, 11)

Findings of Court:
Certificates not registered in the official disability register were deemed forged and thus invalid; previous verification procedures were acknowledged as serious lapses. (Paras 20, 34)

Issues: Whether the respondents rightly deemed certificates forged due to non-registration and whether the petitioners were entitled to a hearing prior to cancellation of their appointments? (Paras 12, 26)

Ratio Decidendi: Court ruled that non-registration invalidated certificates and principles of natural justice were not breached as compliance was unnecessary given the overwhelming evidence of forgery across a significant number of cases. (Paras 24, 28)

Result: Petitions dismissed with liberty granted to produce additional material for consideration of validity of certificates. (Paras 34)

Table of Content
1. challenged order regarding disability certificate. (Para 1 , 2)
2. process of appointment and verification of disability certificates. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. consideration of principles of natural justice. (Para 10 , 12 , 13 , 27 , 29)
4. verification and registration of disability certificates. (Para 11 , 16 , 19 , 21)
5. liberty granted for re-examination of certificates. (Para 31 , 32 , 33)

ORDER :

The petitioners in this batch of writ petitions are aggrieved by the order passed by the office of Commissioner, Public Instructions, Bhopal, whereby their appointment on the post of Madhyamik/Prathmik Shikshak has been cancelled on account of their disability certificate being found forged and invalid. Since, the issue involved in all these petitions is common, the same are being decided by this common order and for convenience sake, the facts are taken from W.P. No.13766/2023 filed by Mr. Dinkar Shukla.

2. The petitioner has invoked Article 226 of Constitution of India, being aggrieved by the order, dated 14.06.2023, (Annexure P/1) passed by respondent no.2- Joint Director, Public Instructions, Gwalior, whereby his appointment on the post of Madhyamik Shikshak (English) has been cancelled on the ground that his disability certificate has been found to be forged and fabricated.

3. The facts necessary for decision of this case are that the School Education Department of Government of Madhya Pradesh intended to fill up posts of Madhyamik Shikshak in various faculties under Rule 5(4) of M.P. School Education Service (Teaching Cadre), Service Conditions & Recruitment Rules, 2018. The Professional Examination Board initiated recruitment process for conducting eligibility test by issuing advertisement, dated 30.12.2019. The petitioner submitted his candidature for appointment on the post of Madhyamik Shikshak in English Subject as a Physically Handicap (in short ‘PH’) candidate. It be noted here that the petitioner claims to be 45% Partially Deaf and has relied upon a disability certificate brought on record as Annexure P/4.

4. The petitioner successfully participated in the eligibility test and vide order, dated 06.10.2021, (Annexure P/2), he was appointed on the post of Madhyamik Shikshak (English). He was given posting in Government Middle School, Bichpuri, District Sheopur. From reading the appointment order, it is gathered that the appointment order was issued after verification of documents. However, the appointed candidate was required to produce the original document with three self-attested copies thereof before the District Education Officer which also included disability certificate for candidates who are appointed under PH category. The petitioner accordingly produced the document before DEO, Sheopur, which were found genuine after verification as is evident from memo, dated 08.10.2021, (Annexure P/3). The petitioner accordingly joined the service and started working.

5. It is gathered from the reply filed by respondents that some complaints were received with regard to disability certificates being relied upon by various candidates in district Ashok Nagar, Chhatarpur, Guna, Katni, Morena, Sagar, Sheopur, Shivpuri, Sidhi, Singrauli, Ujjain & Umariya. Taking cognizance of complaints, enquiry into the allegations was directed. The Collector, Morena, got the petitioner’s disability certificate verified from Civil Surgeon, District Hospital, Morena, who vide memo, dated 12.05.2023, informed that the disability certificates of as many as 77 candidates, including the petitioner, has not been found registered in disability register. Based upon this report, the Collector, Morena, submitted his report to office of Commissioner, Public Instructions vide memo, dated 15.05.2023, reporting that the disability certificates are forged & fabricated. Consequently, vide impugned order, dated 14.06.2023, (Annexure P/1) the petitioner’s appointment has been cancelled having been obtained on the basis of forged disability certificate.

6.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top