Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
PRAKASH CHANDRA GUPTA
Baboo Khan, S/o. Yaseen Khan, (Died) – Appellant
Versus
State Of M.P., Through P.S. Khudel, District Indore (Madhya Pradesh) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction details and prior case context (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. evidence and prosecution responsibility (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. medical examination results (Para 13 , 15 , 17 , 19) |
| 4. witness statements and their reliability (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. right to private defense and criminal trespass (Para 27 , 30 , 31) |
| 6. conclusion and acquittal order (Para 33 , 34) |
ORDER :
PRAKASH CHANDRA GUPTA, J.
The appellants/accused persons have filed this appeal u/s 374(2) of CrPC being aggrieved by judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 06/04/2000 passed by XIVth ASJ Indore, in S.T. no.1/1993 whereby the learned trial court has convicted the appellants u/s 148, 307 r/w 149 (2 counts), 324 r/w 149 of IPC and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 1 year, 5 years (Two counts) and fine of Rs. 500/- and 6 months, to each, respectively, with default stipulation.
2. It was undisputed fact before the learned trial court that a cross sessions case no.158/1993, State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ramzan and 5 others, offence punishable u/s 147, 323 r/w 149, 324 r/w 149 and 307 r/w 149 of IPC, was pending against the complainant party Ramzan (PW/ 11), Abdul Malik (PW/ 1), Abdul Khaliq (PW/ 2)
The court affirmed the right to private defense in property disputes, ruling that actions taken by the accused were justified under IPC provisions, thus overturning their conviction.
Point of Law : Criminal Trial - Private defence - The law of private defence does not require that the person assaulted or facing an apprehension of an assault must run away for safety. It entitles h....
The right of private defense is not applicable where there is a reasonable opportunity to seek protection from public authorities, reaffirming the principle of law over private retribution.
The court emphasized that the burden of proving the right to private defence need not be established by the defence beyond all reasonable doubt, and rejected the appellants' plea of right to private ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that while individuals have the right to private defence of their property, causing death in excess of this right constitutes an offence under the ....
Unlawful assembly – Conviction modified - Victim was assaulted by the appellants causing injuries on his head - Court did not find any such evidence that there was any premeditation or any intention ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application and limitation of the right of private defence, leading to the toning down of the charge and acquittal of the accused from certain ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
