Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
VIVEK RUSIA, BINOD KUMAR DWIVEDI
Ramesh Pal – Appellant
Versus
IDFC First Bank Limited – Respondent
ORDER :
Vivek Rusia, J.
1.Since the issues involved in these petitions are identical in nature, with the joint request of the parties, these M.P.s and R.P. are finally heard and being decided by this common order.
A. Miscellaneous Petition No.6432 of 2023
This Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Article 226 / 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 02.09.2023 passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Jabalpur (in short 'DRT') in S.A. No.299/2013, whereby the application under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 filed for condonation of delay has been dismissed inter alia on the ground that its provision does not apply consequently the S.A. has also been dismissed.
B. Miscellaneous Petition No.4104 of 2023
This Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Article 226 / 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 05.07.2023 passed by the DRT in S.A. No.567/2022, whereby the application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, as well as S.A., has been dismissed.
C. Review Petition No.453 of 2024
This Review Petition is filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking review of the order dated 12.02.2024 passed in Writ Petition N
The DRT has the authority to condone delays in applications under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, applying the Limitation Act provisions.
The DRT must consider the Limitation Act's provisions regarding the condonation of delay in SARFAESI applications, ensuring just consideration of delay reasons.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
