IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR
ANAND PATHAK, HIRDESH
Jagannath – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant challenges conviction in murder case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments for false implication and unreliable witness testimony. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. state supports conviction; evidence deemed credible. (Para 12 , 14 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 4. conviction upheld based on compelling evidence. (Para 35) |
JUDGMENT :
Hirdesh, J.
1.The present criminal appeal under Section 374 (2) of CrPC has been filed by appellant- Jagannath challenging the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 21-12-2013 passed by Third Additional Sessions Judge, Guna in Sessions Trial No.152 of 2013 by which, appellant has been convicted under Section 302 of IPC and sentenced to undergo for Life Imprisonment with fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default of payment of fine amount, he shall further undergo Six Months' additional Rigorous Imprisonment.
2. As per the case of prosecution, on the date of incident i.e. 24-01-2013 around 11:00 am, Sarjan Singh (PW4), brother of Chander Singh (since deceased) submitted a report with Police Chowki Ukawad, PS Jamner to the effect that around 09:00 am in the morning, he received information on his mobile No.9827753304 from mobile No.8103456390 of H
Shingara Singh vs. State of Haryana & Another
Kanakarajan alias Kanakan vs. State of Kerala
Yogesh Singh vs. Mahaveer Singh
Shamim vs. State (NCT of Delhi)
Rizan vs. State of Chhattisgarh
C. Muniappan & Others Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Dhanaj Singh alias Shera and Others vs. State of Punjab
Sawan Singh vs. State of Punjab
Mahesh vs. State of Maharashtra
The court upheld the conviction under IPC Section 302, affirming that witness credibility, including relatives, supports the prosecution when corroborated by medical evidence.
The prosecution must establish the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt based on consistent and trustworthy evidence, including eyewitness testimony, medical evidence, and incriminating cir....
Conviction under IPC 302/34 upheld on reliable sole eyewitness testimony corroborated by medical evidence and witnesses, despite minor discrepancies and non-examination of investigating officer/docto....
Eyewitness testimony holds credibility even when minor contradictions exist; motive for crime established through related witness accounts legitimizes conviction under Section 302 IPC.
Point of law: Every person who witnesses a murder reacts in his own way. Some are stunned, become speechless and stand rooted to the spot. Some become hysteric and start wailing. Some start shouting ....
Eyewitness testimony from injured relatives is credible and can support a conviction, provided it is consistent and corroborated by medical evidence.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and discrepancies in witness testimonies can lead to acquittal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.