SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 580

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
VISHAL DHAGAT, J.
Bhagban Singh Parmar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Madhya Pradesh and Others – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 7841 of 2025
Decided On : 10-03-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Shashank Upadhyay
For the Respondent: Yogesh Dhande

Advocates are permitted to appear in confiscation proceedings under the Advocates Act, 1961, without the right to cross-examine, despite the provisions of the Indian Forest Act, 1927.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226; Advocates Act, 1961 - Section 30; Indian Forest Act, 1927 - Section 52 - Petition challenging confiscation proceedings - Petitioner denied right to engage Advocate - Court found no bar under Section 52 of Indian Forest Act against Advocates' appearance - Emphasized Advocates' rights under Section 30 of Advocates Act to appear before authorized officers - Order of confiscation quashed and liberty granted to obtain documents and file evidence. (Paras 1-6)

(B) Legal Representation - Confiscation proceedings - Court held that while Advocates have right to appear, they cannot cross-examine statements or affidavits presented in such proceedings. (Para 5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged the order denying his right to engage an Advocate in confiscation proceedings resulting from a vehicle involved in a forest offence. Key issue was the availability of legal representation.

Findings of Court:
Affirmed that Advocates may appear in confiscation proceedings, but without the right to cross-examine.

Issues: The primary issues were whether the petitioner could be represented by an Advocate in confiscation proceedings and the interpretation of Sections 30 and 52 of applicable laws.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the Indian Forest Act does not prohibit Advocates from appearing during confiscation proceedings, and affirmed their rights under the Advocates Act, clarifying limitations on cross-examination.

Result: Petition granted, order quashed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to confiscation proceedings (Para 1)
2. arguments on advocate appearance in confiscation (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's reasoning on advocate rights (Para 4 , 5)
4. ruling on advocate participation in confiscation (Para 6)
5. order for petition disposition (Para 7)

ORDER :

1. Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging confiscation proceedings and that order contained in Annexure P/5, dated 15.01.2025, by which petitioner was not allowed to engage an Advocate in the case.

2. Counsel for petitioner submitted that petitioner is not provided documents of the case so that he can file the proper application opposing confiscation of the vehicle. Counsel appearing for petitioner further submitted that there is no bar in Section 52 of Indian Forest Act, 1927 to stop an Advocate to appear for his client before authorized officer doing confiscation proceedings. It is submitted that in judgment reported in Kuldeep Sharma vs. State of M.P. 2012 (2) MPLJ 453 as a corollary, Court has stated that Advocates may not appear as no evidence is to be recorded.

3. Government Advocate appearing for respondents/State opposes the prayer and submitted that Advocate cannot appear in proceedings for confiscation in view of the judgment passed by this Court reported in Kuldeep Sharma (supra). Permission to engage counsel has rightly been rejected under Section 52 . It is submitted that there is no cause of action to challenge confiscation proceedings.

4. Heard the counsel for the parties.

5. As per Section 30 of Advocates Act, 1961, Advocates are given right to appear before any Tribunal or person legally authorized to take evidence. In case of confiscation, authority takes evidence from Forest Department and from owner of vehicle involved in forest offence. Recording of statement, affidavits, documents filed before forest officer is evidence and therefore, as per of Advocates Act, Advocates can appear in confiscation proceedings. There is no bar under Section 52 of Indian Forest Act, 1927 from appearance of Advocates in said proceedings. However, Advocates will not have any right to cross-examination on statement or affidavits filed in proceeding of confiscation.

6. In view of Section 30 of Advocates Act, 1961 and Section 52 of Indian Forest Act, 1927, Advocates can appear before authorized forest officer in confiscation proceedings. Order of D.F.O. dated 15.01.2025 is quashed. Petitioner is granted liberty to file an application to get documents from office of Forest Ranger, Niwari and file its evidence.

7. Petition is disposed off.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top