SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 629

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
SANJAY DWIVEDI, J.
Jitendra Jhariya @ Jittu - Applicant
Versus 
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent 
MISC. Criminal Case No. 5037 of 2025
Decided On : 06-02-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant :Shri Yashovardhan Shukla, Advocate
For the Respondent:Shri Ajay Tamrakar, Government Advocate

The court granted bail based on the prosecutrix's consent and current status as the applicant's spouse, despite initial charges arising from her minority at the time of the alleged offence.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Sections 483 and 480(3); Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Sections 3, 4, 5(1), 6 - Bail application - Applicant in jail since 16.12.2024 for offences involving minor - Applicant's defense contended prior marriage with the prosecutrix, now of majority, indicating consent in statements made under Section 164 - Application for bail granted with conditional personal bond of Rs.50,000/- to ensure appearance. (Paras 1-6)

(B) Consideration for bail - Factors include duration of custody, marriage to prosecutrix now attained majority, and absence of reported coercive acts. (Paras 2-4)

Facts of the case:
The applicant was charged with multiple offences related to the alleged consent of a prosecutrix who was a minor at the time of the alleged offence; both parties subsequently entered into marriage.

Findings of Court:
The court found sufficient grounds for granting bail without commenting on the merits but noting the prosecutrix's current status as the applicant's wife.

Issues: The court addressed whether the prosecutrix's consent negated the charge based on her minority at the time of the incident.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined the relevance of the prosecutrix's current legal status and consent in considering the bail application, highlighting the lack of forceful conduct per her statements.

Result: Bail application allowed.

Table of Content
1. application for bail in criminal case (Para 1)
2. arguments regarding applicant's bail plea (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's considerations for granting bail (Para 4)
4. conditions for bail granted (Para 5 , 6)

ORDER :

This first application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed on behalf of the applicant for grant of bail relating to Crime No.376/2024 registered at Police Station- Thana Ghansaur, District- Seoni, for the offence under Sections 137 (2), 64, 64(2) (m), 238(b), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3 , 4, 5(1), 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is in jail since 16.12.2024. He submits that at the time of marriage or the alleged offence, the prosecutrix was minor, although she and the present applicant both have entered into marriage. He submits that in the statements recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C., the prosecutrix has disclosed that the applicant has not committed any forceful act with her and whatever has been done, it was with her consent and wish, therefore, no case is made-out against the applicant. Upon these submissions, it is prayed that the applicant be released on bail.

3. Per contra, learned counsel for the State opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, perusal of casediary and also the facts that this is a regular bail application, the applicant is an under trial accused and now the prosecutrix has attained majority and is the wife of present applicant, I am inclined to consider this bail application, therefore, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the bail application is allowed.

5. It is directed that the applicant be released on bail upon his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court concerned for his appearance on the dates given by it.

6. On being released on bail, the applicant shall abide by the conditions enumerated in Section 480 (3) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top