Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR
ANAND SINGH BAHRAWAT
Surendra Singh Jatav Died Through Lrs Mrs Meena – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges non-compliance with previous court orders regarding salary fixation and arrears. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court scrutinizes evidence of non-compliance and determines that respondents failed to adhere to the mandate of prior judgment. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. a previous judicial order attains finality and must be fully implemented to ensure fair wages to the employee. (Para 8) |
| 4. the court issues specific consequential directions for payment of arrears and interest following a finding of disobedience. (Para 9) |
ORDER
This petition, under Article 226 of Constitution of India, has been filed seeking following relief (s):-
“(i) That, the action of respondents of not paying the salary to the petitioner from September, 2015 and not paying the regular pay scale and arrears of salary in terms of order passed by this Hon'ble Court in Writ Petition No.4791/2012 may kindly be declared as illegal and be quashed.
(ii) That, the respondents may kindly be directed to allow the petition to sign the attendance register and they may further be directed to make the payment of salary to the petitioner as ordered by this Hon'ble Court in W.P. No. 4971/2012 with arrears and th
Once a judicial order regarding service benefits and pay fixation attains finality, the state is bound to implement it in its entirety. Authorities cannot circumvent such mandates through internal de....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner's appointment is to be treated as an appointment in the post of Peon from the date of his initial appointment on 30.10.2006, an....
Claims for equal pay and regularization must be pursued through proper industrial dispute channels, and misrepresentation disqualifies a party from equitable relief.
The court established that the petitioners were entitled to the higher pay scale as per the Government Resolutions and that the recovery initiated by the respondents was unjust, illegal, and arbitrar....
For placement in a regular pay scale, the claimant has to be a regular appointee selected on the basis of a regular process of recruitment. An employee appointed on a temporary basis cannot claim to ....
If the petitioner perceived that any part of the judgment and order passed by the Labour Court and confirmed by this Court is yet not fully implemented, he may resort to any other remedy, that may be....
All those persons who would be entitled to regularisation/permanent status prior to April 01, 2005 shall be given the benefit of earlier scheme i.e. GPF. However, those who attain this status after A....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the petitioner to regularization in his service against the lowest scale of pay permissible for Grade-IV employees within the PH....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
