SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Tri) 11

S.C.DAS
Land Acquisition Collector – Appellant
Versus
Ramkrishna Goala – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. S. Deb, Sr. Advocate and Mr. D.C. Nath, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. S. Lodh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

S.C. Das, J.:-

This appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, L.A. Act), is directed against the common judgment and award, passed by the learned L.A. Judge, Kamalpur, North Tripura, in case No. Civil Misc. (L.A.) 02 of 2002 along with Civil Misc. (L.A) 7 of 2002.

2. Heard learned Sr. counsel, Mr. S. Deb, assisted by learned counsel, Mr. D.C. Nath for the appellant and learned counsel, Mr. S. Lodh for the respondents.

3. At the very outset, learned Sr. counsel, Mr. Deb with all his fairness has submitted that arising out of acquisition of land under same notification and same Mouja, for the same purpose, by a common judgment in case No. Misc. L.A. 7 of 2002 and Misc. L.A. 2 of 2002, learned L.A. Judge, North Tripura, Kamalpur disposed of both the cases and challenging the judgment, the L.A. Collector preferred two appeals i.e. the present appeal (L.A. Appeal No. 37 of 2003) against Ramkrishna Goala & Ors. and another Appeal (L.A. Appeal No. 38 of 2003) against Manju Rani Shil. It is submitted by learned counsel of both side that L.A. Appeal 38 of 2003 has already been disposed of by this Court by judgment dated 21.02.2012. Learned Sr. counsel, Mr. D






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top