SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Tri) 273

DEEPAK GUPTA
Raju Paul – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:P. Roy Barman, Advocate.
For the Respondents:R.C. Debnath, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Deepak Gupta, CJ.

1. This revision petition is directed against the Judgment dated 12th July, 2006 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, West Tripura, Agartala in Criminal Appeal No. 34(2) of 2004.

By this Judgment, the appeal filed by the present petitioner was dismissed and the Judgment of the learned Magistrate, 1st Class in G.R. Case No. 1048 of 2001 convicting the accused under Sections 417, 465 and 471 IPC and directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year for each of the offences has been upheld. The sentences ordered to run consecutively.

2. Briefly stated the prosecution story is that a complaint was lodged by P.W. 1 Shri Sushil Ch. Shom. The gist of the complaint was that in the first part of December, 2001, the petitioner Raju Paul approached the complainant for being given a job as a driver. While praying for a job, the petitioner had shown the photocopy of his driving licence to the complainant. According to the complainant, he on the basis of the said photocopy of driving licence engaged the petitioner as a driver, but asked him to produce the original driving licence. The petitioner promised the complainant that he would produce the orig









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top