Back
S.C.DAS
Batakrishna Paul – Appellant
Versus
Laxmibala Paul – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.C. Das, J.1. The batch of four writ petitions were taken up together for hearing and disposal since a common judgment was passed by Permanent Lok Adalat, Agartala, in Lok Adalat(PUS) No. 4 of 2007 and Lok Adalat(PUS) No. 6 of 2007, which were instituted on a subject of Public Utility Services and common question of law and fact involved in all the writ petitions and hence this single judgment shall govern all the four writ petitions.
2. Respondent No. 1 of WP(C) No. 255 of 2009 and WP(C) No. 36 of 2010, Smti. Laxmi Bala Paul, as petitioner(hereinafter mentioned as original petitioner) instituted Lok Adalat (PUS) No. 4 of 2007 against the writ petitioners(hereinafter mentioned as original opposite parties, for short OPs) claiming compensation of Rs.10.00 lakhs for the loss of right eye alleging negligence on the part of the OPs, i.e. the writ petitioners.
Similarly, respondent No. 1 of WP(C) No. 256 of 2009 and WP(C) No. 38 of 2010, Sri Narayan Chandra Saha as petitioner(hereinafter mentioned as original petitioner) instituted Lok Adalat (PUS) No. 6 of 2007 before Permanent Lok Adalat, Agartala against the writ petitioners(hereinafter mentioned as original opposite parties,
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
