SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Tri) 26

S.TALAPATRA
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Rani Madan Kumari Devi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:A. Lodh, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

S. Talapatra, J.

1. Both these petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, are taken up together, as by means of those petitions, identical question has been canvassed by the petitioners-Union of India. The question is, whether the interest on solatium can be paid by the executing court, if the Land Acquisition Judge has not "specifically granted" interest on the solatium from the date when the notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was issued or the payment of interest shall be restricted from the date when Sunder Vs. Union of India, reported in : (2001) 7 SCC 211 was pronounced in terms of the interpretation given by the apex court in Gurpreet Singh Vs. Union of India, reported in : (2006) 8 SCC 457.

2. By the impugned order dated 10.04.2013, delivered in Execution (M) No. 01/2006, which has been challenged in CRP No. 6/2014, the executing court has directed payment of interest on the solatium from the day when the notification under Section4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was issued. Similarly, by the impugned order dated 11.04.2013 delivered in Execution (M) No. 12/2003, which has been challenged in CRP No. 8/2014, the






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top