Mantosh Sinha vs Anima Sinha - 2015 Supreme(Tri) 71

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2015 Supreme(Tri) 71

S.C.DAS
Mantosh Sinha – Appellant
Versus
Anima Sinha – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
For the appellant :Mr.Sekhar Datta, Advocate,
For the respondent Nos.1 & 2:Mr. H. K. Bhowmik, Advocate.
For the respondent No.3: Mr. A. Ghosh, P.P.

ORDER :

This appeal against acquittal is directed against judgment and order dated 29.09.2012 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, North Tripura, Kailashahar in Criminal Appeal No.16(2) of 2012, whereunder the learned Sessions Judge set aside the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 30.05.2012 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, North Tripura, Kailashahar in case No. C.R. 112 of 1998.

2. Heard learned counsel, Mr. S. Dutta for the appellant, learned counsel, Mr. H. K. Bhowmik for the respondent Nos.1 and 2 and learned P.P., Mr. A. Ghosh for the respondent No.3.

3. Fact of the case, necessary for disposal of this appeal, may be summarized thus :

The appellant, Sri Mantosh Sinha set the law in motion by filing a written complaint before the Chief Judicial magistrate, North Tripura, Kailashahar alleging, inter alia, that his maternal uncle (mother’s brother), namely, Late Maniraj Sinha, S/O. Late Mantri Sinha was originally a resident of Patharkandi, Assam and after the death of his parents he shifted to the house of the complainant and after completion