SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Tri) 553

U.B.SAHA
Jiban Sarkar – Appellant
Versus
LA Collector, West Tripura, Agartala – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant: Mr. P.K. Pal
For the respondents: Mr. A. Lodh

Order

Feeling dissatisfied with the judgment dated 25.02.2010 passed by the learned LA Judge, Court No. 4, West Tripura, Agartala in Misc. (LA) 52 of 2004 the appellant has preferred this appeal.

2. Heard Mr. PK Pal, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. A Lodh, learned counsel for the respondents.

3. Vide notification No. F.9(4)/- Rev/- Acq/- XIV/- 98 dated 27.02.1998 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, (hereinafter referred to as “LA Act”) and thereafter, declaration under Section 6 of the LA Act vide Notification No. F.9(4)/- Rev/- Acq/- XIV/- 98 dated 27.04.1998, Bastu Class of land measuring 0.10 acres situated at Mouja Anandanagar under Khatian No. 2040, appertaining to CS Plots No. 5788/- 9197 and 5789 was acquired for laying railway track.

4. The LA Collector, West Tripura, (hereinafter referred to as “LA Collector”) gave award of Rs. 11,250/- for the acquired land @ Rs.45,000/- per kani and assessed total compensation of the acquired land @ Rs. 34,332/- together with costs of removal of hutments and admissible interests.

5. The claimant-appellant recei




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top