U.B.SAHA
Lakshmi Kanta Bhattacharjee – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent
1. This appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure is against the judgment and decree dated 27.06.2006 passed in Money Appeal No. 2 of 2005 by the learned Additional District Judge, North Tripura, Dharmanagar whereunder the learned Additional District Judge affirmed the judgment and decree dated 08.09.2005 and 16.09.2005 respectively passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, North Tripura, Dharmanagar in Money Suit No. 1 of 2004 dismissing the suit of the appellant.
2. At the time of admission of this appeal, following substantial questions of law were framed:
(i) Whether both the learned Appellate Court and the trial Court erred in law while passing the impugned judgment by misinterpreting and misconstruing the document marked Exbt.D dated 09.08.1999 issued by the respondent No. 3, or not?
(ii) Is the suit not maintainable on the ground of existence of the arbitration clause in the contract agreement between the parties?
3. There is no dispute that the suit instituted by the appellant was for realization of the amount of Rs. 1,74,215/- for which a bill was submitted through Junior Engineer, Public Health Engineering, Sub-Division No. IV to the Assistan
State of Uttar Pradesh and Another vs. M/s. Janki Saran Kailash Chandra and Another
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.