S.TALAPATRA
Manik Debnath – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent
By means of this writ petition, the petitioners who have claimed to be the street vendors within the meaning of Section 2(1) of the street vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 have challenged the purported action of the respondent namely Agartala Municipal Corporation in violation of the provisions of Section 3(3) of the said Act whereby it has been provided that no street vendor shall be evicted or, as the case may be, relocated till the survey specified under Section 3(1) of the said Act is carried out for the purpose as laid down. Section 3(1) of the said Act provides that the Town Vending Committee shall, within such period and in such manner as may be specified in the scheme, conduct a survey of all existing street vendors, within the area under its jurisdiction, and subsequent survey shall be carried out at least once in every five years. Section 3(2) of the said Act has obligated the Town Vending Committee, as defined under Section 2(m) of the said Act, to ensure that all existing street vendors, identified in the survey, are accommodated in the vending zones subject to a norm, conforming to two and half per cent of the populatio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.