S.C.DAS
Bharat Kumar Ghosh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
The question which fell for consideration at the motion stage itself is whether this Court has territorial jurisdiction to entertain this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution on the ground of cause of action.
2. Heard learned senior counsel, Mr. S. Deb, assisted by learned counsel, Mr. S. Dutta for the petitioner and learned ASG, Mr. H. Deb for the respondentUnion of India.
3. Shorn of unnecessary details, the case of the petitioner is that he was serving under the Border Security Force(for short, BSF) and an FIR No.207 dated 13.11.2012 was lodged from the office of the Commandant, 51 Bn. BSF, Rampura, Fazilka(Punjab) alleging that there was a theft committed in the storeyard of the Unit and properties valued Rs.4,00,000/were stolen. Subsequently, a Security Force Court was constituted and an inquiry was conducted against the petitioner in due process and he was held guilty in the inquiry and consequently the Commandant of 129 Bn. BSF, Rampura, Fazilka, Punjab passed the following order:
“OFFICE OF THE COMMANDANT 129 BN BSF RAMPURA
FAZILKA, PUNJAB
No.Prov/129 Bn/BSF/Theft/Recovery/15/315559
Dated 09/10 Mar, 2015
ORDER
As per the direction of SHQ BSF Abohar an
Navin chandra N. Majithia v. State of Maharashtra reported in (2000) 7 SCC 640
Nawal Kishore Sharma v. Union of India reported in (2014) 9 SCC 329
Oil and Natural Gas Commission v. Uptal Kumar Basu (1994) 4 SCC 711
K.S. Rashid and Son v. Income Tax Investigation Commission
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.