SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Tri) 51

S.TALAPATRA
Biplabendu Roy – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. A. Bhowmik, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. J. Majumder and Mr. P. Datta, Advocates.

ORDER :

1. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has urged this Court for directing the respondents to absorb him in the borrowing department, Department of Finance and to extend him all financial benefits for such absorption. The petitioner has also urged to restrain the respondents from filling up the post of Law Officer under the Finance Department by a writ of prohibition.

2. The facts are mostly admitted. The petitioner while working as the Senior Mechanic in the loaning department, the Tripura Road Transport Corporation, the TRTC in short, was deputed to the Finance Department by the communication under No.2(24)TRTC/DMB (T)/Vol-II/9293/312 dated 23.10.2003. In terms of the said communicated dated 23.10.2003, the petitioner joined in the office of Commissioner of Taxes under the Finance Department in the forenoon of 01.11.2003. The petitioner had been discharging his duties to the entire satisfaction of the authority. As corollary, by the office order dated 29.11.2004, Annexure-P/8 to the writ petition, the petitioner was asked to function as the Nodal Officer (Legal) in additional to his normal duties on a purely temporary basis until further order. For such additional
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top