SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Tri) 88

S.TALAPATRA
Soma Paul – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Somik Deb
For the Respondent: Mr. S. Chakraborty, Addl. G.A.

ORDER :

By means of these writ petitions, being W.P(C) No.488 of 2015 (Smt. Soma Pal vs. The State of Tripura), W.P(C) No.489 of 2015 (Smt. Sarmistha Majumder vs. The State of Tripura) and being W.P(C) No.490 of 2015 (Smt. Chandrani Chakraborty vs. The State of Tripura), the petitioners who were appointed to the post of the Senior Instructor, Group-C (Non-Gazetted) in the Tripura Institute of Technology, the TIT in short, under the Higher Education Department, formerly known as the Polytechnic Institute have urged for direction to consider them for promotion to the post of Foreman Instructor preceded by a declaration that the petitioners are eligible for such consideration. Alternatively, the petitioners have urged for direction on the respondents to ‘create a promotional avenue for the further post’. Sans a little variation somewhere in the fact, the core question involved, these writ petitions are identical and hence, clubbed together for disposal by a common judgment.

2. There is no dispute that the writ petitioner in W.P.(C) No. 488 of 2015, namely Smt. Soma Pal and the writ

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top