SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Tri) 82

S.TALAPATRA
Tara Sen – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Somik Deb, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. Bidyut Majumder, Mr. A. Sengupta, Advocate

ORDER :

By means of this petition, the petitioners have fundamentally challenged the action of the respondents No. 1 to 4 for declaring them ineligible for consideration under the Career Advancement Scheme (CAS) to the higher grade (AGP Rs.7,000) whereas the persons who were appointed on the same day or thereafter, have been given the said benefit, in colourable exercise of power. The petitioners have further urged this court for directing the respondents No. 1 to 4 for considering their upgradation of AGP under CAS.

2. Facts which are not in dispute are that the petitioner No.1, Mrs. Tara Sen (UR) was appointed in terms of the notification dated 06.04.2010 as the Assistant Professor in the Civil & Transportation Engineering Department, the petitioner No.2, Ms Seena Priyan (OBC) was appointed in terms of the said notification dated 06.04.2010 as the Assistant Professor in the Production Engineering Department whereas the petitioner No.3, Dr. Gyanabati Khuraijam (OBC) was appointed as the A




































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top