S.TALAPATRA
Md. Jahar Hossain Bhuiya, son of Md. Jamal Uddin Bhuiya – Appellant
Versus
Hasina Begam – Respondent
Heard Mr. D. K. Daschoudhury, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as Mr. G.S. Bhattacharji, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
2. By filing this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., the judgment dated 29.04.2015 delivered in Criminal Appeal No. 29(3) of 2014 is partly challenged.
3. The appeal which was filed by the petitioner under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was from the order dated 18.06.2014, delivered in the proceeding for the protection order and for return of the Stridhan being CR(DV)21 of 2013. By the order dated 18.06.2014, the Magistrate has directed as under :
"Thus, therefore, considering all this aspect, I find, as the present case is filed after one year of domestic violence, the same is barred by law of limitation and not maintainable and the aggrieved petitioner is not entitled to get any Stridhan and properties."
The said appeal was filed to question the legality of that findings.
4. By the impugned order dated 29.04.2015, delivered in Criminal Appeal No. 29(3) of 2014 that finding was reversed on observing as under :
"
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.