S.TALAPATRA
New India Assurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Arati Das, wife of late Ajit Das – Respondent
This is an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act from the judgment and award dated 25.11.2013 delivered in T.S.(MAC) 240 of 2011 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, West Tripura, Agartala.
2. By means of this appeal, the appellant, New India Assurance Company Limited has raised a solitary ground of objection that the claimant-respondents, for death of the owner and driver of the vehicle No.TR-01-J-1579 (G.C. Max) namely Ajit Das are not entitled to get any compensation by virtue of the Insurance Policy.
3. The facts relating to the accident are not in dispute. Ajit Das, the victim while driving his vehicle bearing registration No.TR-01-J-1579 from Lembucherra Bazar to his destination at Bamutia, he met an accident and received serious injuries. He was immediately shifted to the GBP hospital and he was declared dead by the attending Medical Officer. The legal heirs of Ajit Das, since deceased, filed a claim petition under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicle Act for compensation for the death of Ajit Das, in the said accident that occurred on 27.04.2011 at a place near Lembucherra. According to the claimant-respondents, Ajit Das died at the age of 40(for
Branch Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs. Mandansha Sherpa and Others
Dhanraj Vs. New India Assurance Company Limited and Another
New India Assurance Company Limited vs. Sadanand Mukhi and Others
National Insurance Company Limited vs. Laxmi Narain Dhut
Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Jhuma Saha and Others
Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs. Rajni Devi and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.