S.TALAPATRA
National Insurance Company Limited, represented by its Divisional Manager – Appellant
Versus
Ashalata Bhowmik, wife of Sri. Haripada Bhowmik – Respondent
This is an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act from the judgment and award dated 25.11.2014 delivered in T.S.(MAC) 382 of 2012 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, West Tripura, Agartala, Court No.1.
2. Without projecting any direct challenge against the basic fact of the accident, the appellant has raised two pronged objections viz.,
(i) When the accident occurred for negligence of the insured being the owner of the vehicle can he be entitled to get compensation under Section 166 of the MV Act ?
(ii) Whether the insurer in such circumstances can be fastened with the liability to pay the compensation, if any?
3. It has not been disputed by the appellant that on 20.05.2012 at about 7.30 p.m. in the evening, while one Dilip Bhowmik was returning home from Kathaltali by driving his vehicle bearing No TR-01-U-0530, he met an accident on the bye-pass under Amtali Police Station. From the said accident, he sustained grievous injuries on his person. He was rushed to the TMC & Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Memorial Teaching Hospital, Hapania, but from there he was referred to the AGMC & GBP Hospital, Agartala. The Medical Officer of that hospital declared him dead. At th
Dhanraj v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.
Minu B. Mehta & Anr. vs. Balkrishan Ramchandra Nayan & Anr.
National Insurance Company Ltd. Vrs. Bala Krishnan and another
Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs. Meena Variyal & Ors.
Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs. Jhuma Saha and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.