Heard Mr. D.R. Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff-appellants as well as Mr. S.M. Chakraborty, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. S. Saha, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

2. This is an appeal under Section 100 of the CPC from the judgment dated 29.09.2012 delivered in Title Appeal No. 28 of 2010 by the Addl. District Judge, Court No.3, Agartala, West Tripura. The said judgment is a common judgment delivered in Title Appeal No.27 of 2010 and Title Appeal No.28 of 2010.

3. At the time of admission of this appeal following substantial questions of law were formulated by this court:

(i) Whether the judgment and decree suffer from perversity

(ii) Whether the courts below failed to appreciate the implication of Section 43 of TLR and LR Act, 1960.

Liberty was granted to the plaintiff-appellants to raise any other substantial question of law at the time of hearing.

4. By exercising that liberty the plaintiff-appellants filed an interlocutory application being IA 126 of 2017 in this court urging to formulate two more substantial questions of law, but by the order passed today the said interlocutory application has been rejected assigning rea