SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Tri) 169

S.C.DAS
Kajal Sarkar, W/o Sri Pradip Ranjan Mitra – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura, Represented by the Secretary, Social Welfare & Social Education Department, Government of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. C.S. Sinha, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. H. Deb, learned ASG.

JUDGMENT & ORDER(ORAL) :

Learned counsel, Mr. C.S. Sinha for the petitioners and learned ASG, Mr. H. Deb for the respondent No.4 are present.

No representation on behalf of respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3.

2. On earlier occasion also there was no representation on behalf of respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3. On the request of learned counsel Mr. Sinha and Mr. Deb, the matter is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself since it is submitted that the issue involved in these five writ petitions are covered by the judgment dated 24.01.2017, passed by this Court in WP(C) 71 of 2011. A copy of that judgment is placed on record.

3. After going through the writ petitions and the judgment dated 24.01.2017 I find justification in the submission of learned counsel of the parties that these writ petitions are well covered by that judgment because the facts and points of law are identical.

4. The writ petitioners were appointed as Anganwadi Workers under Integrated Child Development Project (ICDS). The Scheme was sponsored by the Central Govt. On their engagement by the State Govt. as Anganwadi












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top