SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Tri) 361

S.TALAPATRA
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Kanai Debnath – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Biswanath Majumder
For the Respondent: Mr. P. Chakaraborty

JUDGMENT & ORDER :

Heard Mr. Biswanath Majumder, learned CGC appearing for the appellant who by filing this appeal, under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, [the L.A. Act in short] 1894, has challenged the judgment and award dated 24.08.2011, delivered in Misc. (LA) 19 of 2006.

2. The respondent No.1, the referring claimant had 3 gandas (.06 acres) of land comprised in cadastrally surveyed Plot No.2633/9094 recorded in the Khatian No.3284 of Mouja-Madhuban under Surjyamaninagar Tehsil. The said land was acquired for construction of bye-pass road from Khayerpur to Amtali [the acquired land, in the judgment it has been stated to be situated under Uttar Charilam Mouja]. By the notification dated 29.01.2004, the process for acquisition was started. On 12.03.2004 the declaration under Section 6 of the L.A. Act was issued for acquisition of the said land. The L.A. Collector, West Tripura, Agartala, the respondent No.2 following the process under Sections 9 to 12 of the L.A. Act, had determined the award at Rs. 2,00,000/- per kani. The referring claimant was declared to have additional compensation and solatium respectively @ 12% and 30% from the date of the notification with interest














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top