S.TALAPATRA
Ashmita Saha (minor), daughter of Sri Nitai Lal Saha – Appellant
Versus
Sikha Rani Saha, wife of Sri Hari Mohan Saha – Respondent
1. Heard Mr. B.N. Majumder, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Ms. S. Deb Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the defendant-respondent.
2. This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India questioning the legality of the order dated 17.04.2017, delivered in Civil Misc.38 of 2017 arising from Title Suit No.38 of 2016. The plaintiff who is, being minor, represented by her natural guardian and father Sri Nitai Lal Saha filed a petition for amendment of the plaint in the said suit, in the wake of submission of the written statement by the respondent. By the said application dated 17.02.2017, the plaintiff-petitioner sought amendment in the cause title of the plaint and some addition or substitution of pleadings. Such amendment was proposed in paras-5, 6 and 9.
3. In addition, the plaintiff-petitioner sought substitution of para-10 by adding the new pleadings. The plaintiff-petitioner has further proposed amendment of para-11 and incorporation of a new relief viz. declaration that the plaintiff-petitioner (the minor) is the owner of the suit property by virtue of the gift deed dated 17.04.2009.
4. The defendant-respondent had robu
Abdul Rehman & Another vs. Ruldu & Others reported in (2012) 11 SCC 341
J. Samuel and Others vs. Gattu Mahesh and Others
Rameshkumar Agarwal vs. Rajmala Exports Pvt. Ltd. and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.