SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Tri) 173

ARINDAM LODH
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Putul Rani Das, W/O- Late Ranjan Das – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. P. Gautam, Adv
For the Respondents: Mr. S. Lodh, Adv

JUDGMENT AND ORDER :

1. This Appeal is directed against the judgment and award dated 25.04.2013 passed by the learned Member Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Court No.4, West Tripura, Agartala in Case No. T.S. (MAC) 292/2010, wherein the learned Tribunal has fastened the liability of payment of compensation upon the appellant-Insurance Company.

2. Being aggrieved by the said judgment and award the appellant-Oriental Insurance Company has preferred this appeal on the ground that the learned Tribunal has committed serious error in mis-interpreting and mis-construing and also mis-reading the terms and conditions laid down in the policy.

3. Mr. P. Gautam, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has placed reliance upon the policy document to which Mr. S. Lodh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the insured owner did not raise any objection. That means policy document is undisputed.

Learned counsel for the appellant at the very outset, drawing my attention to the policy document submits that the vehicle involved in the accident was a goods carrying vehicle having sitting

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top