ARINDAM LODH
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Putul Rani Das, W/O- Late Ranjan Das – Respondent
1. This Appeal is directed against the judgment and award dated 25.04.2013 passed by the learned Member Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Court No.4, West Tripura, Agartala in Case No. T.S. (MAC) 292/2010, wherein the learned Tribunal has fastened the liability of payment of compensation upon the appellant-Insurance Company.
2. Being aggrieved by the said judgment and award the appellant-Oriental Insurance Company has preferred this appeal on the ground that the learned Tribunal has committed serious error in mis-interpreting and mis-construing and also mis-reading the terms and conditions laid down in the policy.
3. Mr. P. Gautam, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has placed reliance upon the policy document to which Mr. S. Lodh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the insured owner did not raise any objection. That means policy document is undisputed.
Learned counsel for the appellant at the very outset, drawing my attention to the policy document submits that the vehicle involved in the accident was a goods carrying vehicle having sitting
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.