This is an appeal under Section 100 of the CPC from the judgment dated 27.07.2015 delivered in Title Appeal No. 43 of 2013 by the District Judge, West Tripura, Agartala.

2. By the said judgment dated 27.07.2015, the judgment dated 05.04.2013 delivered in Title Suit 129 of 2005 by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Court No.2, Agartala, West Tripura (hereinafter referred to as the trial court) has been affirmed and consequently, the first appeal has been dismissed. By the said judgment dated 05.04.2013, the suit instituted by the appellant has been dismissed.

3. At the time of admitting this appeal, the following substantial question of law was framed by the order dated 04.02.2016 :

“Whether the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court and affirmed by the appellate Court suffer from perversity for non appreciation/mis-appreciation of the pleadings and evidence on record ?”

The appellant was strangely given liberty to raise any other substantial question of law at the time of hearing. But Mr. Mahajan, learned counsel appearing for the appellant did not press any other substantial question of law for purpose of challenging the impugned judgment dated 27.07.2015.

4. Th