SANJAY KAROL, ARINDAM LODH
Laxmi Bala Paul – Appellant
Versus
Batakrishna Paul – Respondent
A. LODH, J.
1. By means of filing this intra court appeal, the appellant Smt. Laxmi Bala Paul has challenged the judgment and order dated 21.11.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.255 of 2009 and WP(C) No.36 of 2010 wherein while deciding both the writ petitions together, the learned single judge has set aside the order of payment of compensation awarded by the Permanent Lok Adalat in favour of the appellant herein.
2. The facts in brief:
2.1 The appellant herein, Smt. Laxmi Bala Paul, has approached the Permanent Lok Adalat by filing Lok Adalat (PUS) Case No.4 of 2007 against the respondents complaining gross negligence and deficiency in providing services relating to her eye operation and claimed compensation of Rs. 10,00,000/- (Rupees ten lakhs) only. The Permanent Lok Adalat took cognizance. Thereafter, after considering the materials on record and the evidences adduced by the parties has awarded Rs. 2,00,000/-(Rupees two lakhs only) as compensation with interest in favour of the appellant vide its judgment dated 08.06.2009. In the complaint filed before the permanent Lok Adalat, it is stated that on 10.05.2006, the appellant herein along with her son vis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.