S.TALAPATRA
Bibhuti Ranjan Das – Appellant
Versus
Gouri Das – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S. Talapatra, J.
1. By means of this revision, the petitioner has questioned the legality of the judgment and order dated 17.06.2019 delivered in Misc. Case No.462 of 2015 by the Additional Judge, Family Court, West Tripura Agartala. By the said judgment and order dated 17.06.2019, the petitioner has been directed to pay maintenance at Rs. 4000/- per month to the respondent, the petitioner in the original proceeding under Section 125 of the CrPC from 01.07.2019 until further order for the OP has his previous wife and children and he has also to maintain them. Such maintenance has been directed to be paid within 10th day of every calendar month by money order on deducting the cost of money order from the said amount of maintenance. Further, it is undisputed that in the proceeding being Misc. Case No.462 of 2016, the Judge, Family Court, Agartala had directed the petitioner herein to pay of a sum of Rs. 12000/- per month. The said proceeding was initiated as the petitioner herein had stopped maintaining the respondent from 2013, but the petitioner (the opposite party in the proceeding before the Family Court) has claimed that the respondent is not his wife. His legally marri
Dwarika Prasad Satpathy vs. Bidyut Prava Dixit and Anr.
Badshah Vs. Urmila Badshah Godse and Anr.
Chanmuniya vs. Virendra Kumar Sing Kushwaa and Anr.
Yamunabai Anantrao Adhav v. Anantrao Shivram Adhav and Another
Savitaben Somabhai Bhatiya vs. State of Gujarat
Badshah vs. Urmila Badshah Godse and Another
Tulsa and Others vs. Durghatiya and Others
Andrahennedige Dinohamy v. Wijetunge Liyanapatabendige Blahamy
Mohabhat Ali v. Md. Ibrahim Khan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.