SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Tri) 11

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
S. Talapatra, J.
Onkar Sadhan Adhikari son of late Bibhuti Bhusan Adhikari, - Petitioner
Versus
Tripura University represented by the Registrar and ors. – Respondents
WP(C) 404 of 2020
Decided On : 16-04-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. T. Debbarma, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. B. N. Majumder, Sr. Adv. Mr. Raju Datta, Adv. Mr. R. Tewari, Adv.

Point of Law: Existing pension at the rate of Central University be stopped - petitioner had been substantively appointed in the post of the Registrar of Tripura University. Hence, the service rendered by the petitioner under the University of Calcutta and Tripura University would be treated as the qualifying service.

Headnote:

Fundamental Rule and Supplementary Rules of Govt. of India - Tripura University Act, 2006 - Pension - Matter Relating to Pension for Employees - Post of Registrar - Retire from Services - Petitioner being eligible for appointment to post of Registrar applied for selection - Essential qualifications as required for such selection had also been mentioned in said advertisement - Petitioner got selected by Selection Committee as constituted by Tripura University - On recommendation of Selection Committee, offer of appointment was issued - It is pertinent to note that in the offer of appointment, it had been clearly laid down that petitioner will be placed on probation for a period of one year from the date of joining - Petitioner resigned from the University of Calcutta where he had held the post of Controller of Examinations on 11.02.2014 afternoon to enable him to join the post of the Registrar Tripura University - University of Calcutta had issued release certificate By notification taking over of charge by the petitioner as Registrar, Tripura University in [forenoon] has been acknowledged by a communication petitioner was apprised that he would retire from services on attaining age of 62 years being his date of birth, petitioner was asked to take clearance from library, laboratory, if applicable updating of service book and adjustment of advance, etc - As stated earlier, by memorandum it has notified by Tripura University how the pension of petitioner would be determined - Even revision of pension and other benefits had also been decided - Since petitioner's legal entertainment was being deferred for inaction of respondents, the petitioner made several representations for undoing the injustice –

Finding of the Court: In case of petitioner, he had to superannuate in view of the said superannuation clause - As petitioner has superannuated from permanent post of the Registrar even though said post is a tenure post and hence, the petitioner is entitled to pension and other retirement benefits under Central University Rules. It is made further clear that the petitioner will be entitled to all benefits in terms of Statute 2(5)(ii) as reproduced before - As consequence of the above observation, decision as taken by Executive Council in its 32nd and 33rd meetings held on 13.12.2018 and 30.08.2019 so far the pension and other retirement benefits of the petitioner are concerned, is liable to be interfered with and as consequence thereof the said decision stands set aside - Consequential memorandum is bound to be quashed. It is ordered accordingly - As corollary to the above observations, decision to recover the purported excess payment is interfered with and set aside - Petitioner shall continue to get his pension as per Central University Rules and he shall also be entitled to the revised pension and other retirement benefits under 7th CPC including arrears - University-respondents shall release pension and other retirement benefits to the petitioner within a period of two months from today, else said, as due amount, shall carry interest at the rate of 7% per annum from the date when the amount fell due till the amount is paid –

Result: Writ petition allowed.

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. T. Debbarma learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. B. N. Majumder, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. R. Datta and Mr. R.Tewari, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has challenged the decision of the executive council taken in its 32nd meeting (Annexure-23 to the writ petition). In the said meeting, it was resolved as under:

    “(ii) The Report of the Committee constituted vide letter No.TU/REG/EC/29/2017, dated 27.01.2017 was placed in the meeting. The members of the Council resolved that the existing pension at the rate of Central University be stopped to Shri Onkar Sadhan Adhikari, Ex-Registrr, T.U Instead, Shri Adhikari be allowed pension as per the norms and rules of the University of Calcutta where he held the substantive pot before joining to the tenure post of the Registrar at Tripura University. Further, it is resolved that necessary steps be taken to recover the excess amount paid to Shri Adhikari beyond the admissible rules.

Further, it has been resolved that adequate steps be taken by the University to fix the responsibilities for the breach of rules for showing undue favour to Shir O.S. Adhikari, Ex-Registrar and necessary action be taken as per the established rules.”

[Emphasis added]

3. It is evident from the notification dated 27.11.2017 (Annexure-R3 to the reply filed by the University respondents) that a committee was constituted to look into the matter relating to the pension for employees of Tripura University and to the matter of pension of the petitioner who has served as the Registrar of Tripura University, hereinafter referred to as the University, even though there had been no express reference. The said committee, as referred, in the resolution as adopted in the 32nd meeting of the Executive Council has made certain observation in respect of the pension that has been accorded by the Tripura University in respect of the petitioner:

    2] The matter of pension of Shri O.S. Adhikari, Former Registrar of Tripura University

Following documents were examined in detail.

(i) Fundamental Rule and Supplementary Rules of Govt. of India.

(ii) Tripura University Act, 2006 No.9 of 2007;

(iii) Copy of appointment letter issued to Sri O.S. Adhikari, Ex-Registrar stating terms of appointment/

(iv) Copy of Memo No.F.TU/REG/PF-OFFICER/29/2014 dated 12th February, 2018 issued by Tripura University in favour of Sri O.S. Adhikari, former Registrar.

Observation of the Committee:

1. Registrar’s post of Tripura University as per the Tripura University Act, 2006 is a ‘Tenure post;

2. According to the Fundamental Rules of Govt. of India point no.(22), page no.9, ‘Permanent post’ means a post carrying a definite rate of payment sanctioned without limit of time; whereas ‘Tenure Post’ means a permanent post which an individual Government servant may not hold for more than a limited period;

3. Tripura University Act, 2006 does not provide for a ‘Probationary Period’ to a tenure post;

4. Sri O. S. Adhikari, former Registrar was serving as the Controller of Examination at University of Kolkata on a substantive post under West Bengal State University Act prior to Joining Tripura University.

5. However, appointment letter no.TU/REG/PF-OFFICER/29/2014, dated 30.01.2014 issued by Tripura University to Sri O. S. Adhikari, former Registrar, states in the third paragraph “He will be on probation for a period of one year from the date of joining”.

6. Tripura University through its memo no.F.TU/REG/PF-OFFICER/29/2014 dated 12.02.2015 state “Sri Onkar Sadhan Adhikari, Registrar, Tripura University has successfully completed one year of his service period and the University authority has been pleased to absorb him permanently to the post of Registrar for a tenure of five years or till the attainment of sixty tow years of age from the date of his joining to this Universtiy from 12th February, 2014 onwards.”

7. Now the appointment letter and the memo (aforesaid point No.

                                                                Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                                                1
                                                                2
                                                                3
                                                                4
                                                                5
                                                                6
                                                                7
                                                                8
                                                                9
                                                                10
                                                                11
                                                                SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                                                supreme today icon
                                                                logo-black

                                                                An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                                                Please visit our Training & Support
                                                                Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                                                qr

                                                                Scan Me!

                                                                India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                                                For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                                                whatsapp-icon Back to top