Biswajit Ghosh vs State of Tripura - 2021 Supreme(Tri) 88

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Tri) 88

S.G.CHATTOPADHYAY
Biswajit Ghosh – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Samar Das, Advocate
For the Respondents: S. Ghosh, Addl. Public Prosecutor

JUDGMENT :

S.G. Chattopadhyay, J.

1. Petitioner has filed this criminal revision petition challenging the judgment dated 20.12.2018 delivered in Criminal Appeal No. 3 of 2018 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhalai Judicial District, Kamalpur affirming the conviction and sentence of the petitioner awarded by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Kamalpur by judgment and order dated 09.01.2018 in PRC (WP) 30/2016 whereby the trial Court imposed sentence on the petitioner as under:

SECTION	SENTENCE	FINE	DEFAULT SENTENCE
279 IPC	--	Rs. 1000/-	--
338 IPC	R.I. for 2 (two) months	Rs. 1000/-	S.I. for 10(ten) days.
304A IPC	R.I. for 2 (two) months	Rs. 2000/-	S.I. for 15(fifteen) days.
184 M.V. Act	--	Rs. 1000/-	S.I. for 10(ten) days.

It was ordered that the sentences would run concurrently. Judgment of the trial Court was affirmed in appeal by the impugned judgment. Aggrieved petitioner has challenged the judgment of the appellate Court by means of filing this criminal revision petition.

2. Genesis of the prosecution case is rooted in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(Tri) 88

S.G.CHATTOPADHYAYBiswajit Ghosh – AppellantVersusState of Tripura – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

S.G.CHATTOPADHYAY
Biswajit Ghosh – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent