SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Tri) 175

S. TALAPATRA
Tarun Kumar Sinha – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ms. S. Debgupta, Adv, for the Appellant; Mr. D. Sharma, Addl. G.A, Ms. P. Dhar, Adv, for the Respondent

ORDER

S. Talapatra, J. - Heard Ms. S. Debgupta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. D. Sharma, learned Addl. G.A. appearing for the respondents No.1 and 2 and Ms. P. Dhar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.3.

2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has urged this court to direct the respondents to pay his gratuity, payable within the upper limit at Rs.20,00,000/-, instead of Rs.4,00,000/- on which he has been paid his gratuity by the respondent No.2. By means of the amendment, carried out in Sub-Section-3 of Section-4 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, the earlier provision of relating to maximum limit for payment of gratuity has been rephrased in the following manner:

"The amount of gratuity payable to an employee shall not exceed. Such amount as may be notified by the Central Government from time to time. "The Central Government having regard to the said provision [Sub-Section-3 of Section-4 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972] has specified the amount for gratuity to be paid to an employee under the said Act. It has been notified that the amount shall not exceed Rs.20,00,000/- [see A.O.1420(E) dated 29.03.2018]. Prior to the said

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top