SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 95

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
Indrajit Mahanty, S. G. Chattopadhyay, JJ.
Rasheda Khatun & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
The State of Tripura & Ors. - Respondents
W.P(C) No. 797 of 2021
Decided On : 22-06-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. P. Roy Barman, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Samarjit Bhattacharjee, Advocate, Mr. Kawsik Nath, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. S. S. Dey, Advocate, General, Mr. Ratan Datta, Public Prosecutor, for the Respondent.

Custodial torture leading to death violates Article 21; State is liable for compensation due to vicarious liability for its officials' actions.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 21 - Custodial death - Petitioners claim compensation for custodial torture and death of Jamal Hossain - Police alleged to have assaulted the deceased prior to his death in lockup - Inquiry conducted revealing injuries on deceased matched with police assault claims - Compensation awarded for violation of the fundamental right to life - The court recognized vicarious liability of the State for actions of its officials. (Paras 17-18)

(B) Police Misconduct - Allegations of custodial torture - The court emphasized the need for proper investigation into custodial deaths and held that monetary compensation serves as a remedy for established violations of fundamental rights. (Paras 14-16)

Facts of the case:
Jamal Hossain was arrested by police on accusations related to drug and robbery cases. He allegedly died due to custodial torture shortly after his arrest. The petitioners claimed that the deceased was completely fit before capture and sought compensation for wrongful death.

Findings of Court:
The court noted that the cause of death was acute coronary artery disease but acknowledged the presence of ante-mortem injuries, thus raising suspicion of police involvement.

Issues: The case involved queries regarding custodial violence, the responsibility of police in the death of Jamal Hossain, and the entitlement of the petitioners to compensation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court highlighted the necessity for accountability in custodial deaths, indicating that the presence of injuries suggests a likelihood of police violence, warranting compensation under Article 21.

Result: The writ petition was allowed, with the State directed to pay Rs.10,00,000/- as compensation to the petitioners.

Table of Content
1. request for compensation due to custodial death. (Para 1 , 2)
2. circumstances leading to jamal hossain's death. (Para 4 , 5)
3. arguments on the cause of death and responsibility. (Para 8 , 9)
4. contradictory statements regarding injuries. (Para 10 , 11)
5. custodial violence cannot be ruled out. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
6. principles governing compensation for custodial deaths. (Para 16 , 17)
7. order for compensation and conclusion of the petition. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)

JUDGMENT AND ORDER

S.G. Chattopadhyay, J. - In this writ petition, a prayer has been made to call upon the State to pay compensation for the death of Jamal Hossain who died due to custodial torture in police lockup during the intervening night between 14.09.2021 and 15.09.2021. The writ petitioners are the wife, mother and children of the deceased who have made the following prayers:

(i) Issue Rule upon the respondents to show cause as to why, in the nature of mandamus and /or Order or direction shall not be issued whereby entrusting the investigation of Sonamura P.S Case No.2021 SNM 092, U/s-304/34 of IPC to CID Tripura, for carrying out the investigation under the supervision of the Hon'ble High Court of Tripura;

(ii) Issue Rule upon the Respondents to show cause as to why Writ in the nature of mandamus and/or Order or direction shall not be issued whereby directing judicial inquiry by sitting District Judge of Tripura to enquire into the circumstances, leading to the custodial death of Jamal Hossain in police custody on 15.09.2021 & fix up the responsibility for such custodial death;

(iii) Issue Rule upon the Respondents to show cause as to why writ in the nature of mandamus and/or Order or direction shall not be issued whereby directing the Respondents to pay compensation of an amount of Rs.50 lakhs to the Petitioners for the death of Jamal Hossain in Police Custody of Sonamura Police Station.

(iv) Issue Rule upon the Respondents to show cause as to why Writ in the nature of mandamus and/or Order or direction shall not be issued whereby direct the I.O of Sonamura P.S Case No.92/2021, to add Section-302 in Sonamura P.S Case No.92/2021, dated 15.09.2021, U/s 304/34 of IPC.

(v) Pass an interim order directing the Respondents to pay at least Rs-5 lakhs as interim compensation to the Petitioners.

(vi) Make the rules absolute,

(vii) Call for records,

Pass any further order/orders as this Hon'ble High Court considered fit and proper.

2. The facts taken from the writ petition are as under:

27 years old Jamal Hossain alias Kala who was serving as a Cleaner in Dubai came home in the month of September, 2021 to enjoy his vacation with his family consisting of his mother, wife and children. He was scheduled to return to Dubai on 22.09.2021 for which he already bought a return ticket from Indigo Airlines. On14.09.2021 at about 11.30 pm a police team consisting of 6/7 police personal led by Sri Tapan Debnath entered into the house of the petitioners and enquired as to whether Jamal Hossain was at home. As soon as Jamal came out of his room, the police team caught hold of him and started beating him. Before leaving along with Jamal Hossain, one of the members of the police team remarked that everybody would see the dead body of Jamal Hossain on the following day. On 15.09.2021 at about7.30 am Md. Aktar Hossain and Mst. Ajufa Khatun came to the police station to see their brother. Police did not allow them to meet their brother. At around 9.30 a.m. they were informed that their brother Jamal Hossain died in the lockup. Petitioners alleged that when the police team was assaulting Jamal Hossain at the time of his arrest, his wife and mother begged of them to refrain from beating him. But they did not pay heed to their request. It has been alleged that as a result of their torture, Jamal Hossain who was completely fit before his arrest, died in police lockup within few hours of his arrest. Wife of the deceased lodged a written FIR with the Officer-in-charge of Sonam

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top