SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 27

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
T. Amarnath Goud, J.
Arpana Malakar @ Aparna Malakar & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Sub-divisional Magistrate Kailashahar & Ors. - Respondents
RSA 52 of 2018
Decided On : 24-02-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. S. Lodh, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. D. Bhattacharjee, GA, Mr. P. Saha, Advocate, for the Respondent

The appellate court's decision was deemed perverse for disregarding an unchallenged survey report on ownership, necessitating a re-evaluation of the case.

Headnote:(A) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Section 100 - Unakoti Judicial District - Title Appeal - Appeal against reversal of trial court's decree - The appellants claimed ownership over specific land areas, asserting their title through auction purchase and subsequent partition following the death of their ancestor. The defendants countered with claims of fraud regarding land records. (Paras 2-7, 16, 18)

(B) Legal Principles - Ownership claims under auction purchase; the necessity of proper land record maintenance; the impact of partition deeds on ownership rights; judicial scrutiny of appellate authority's decision-making process as it pertains to evidence assessment. (Paras 17-18)

Facts of the case:
The appellants, as legal heirs, sought to confirm their ownership and possession over lands previously auctioned to their predecessor, against claims of fraudulent title by the respondents. The trial court had decreed in favor of the appellants, which was subsequently reversed by the appellate court on procedural grounds.

Findings of Court:
The court found inconsistencies in land title documentation and emphasized the need for a thorough re-examination of evidence, including a land survey.

Issues: Key issues included the integrity of the land title, the relevance of the survey commissioner's report, and whether the appellate court acted beyond its jurisdiction.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the lower appellate court's judgment was perverse, failing to respect the survey commissioner's unchallenged findings, and mandated a reevaluation of the ownership evidence.

Result: Appeal allowed; matter remanded to the lower appellate court for reevaluation.

Table of Content
1. overview of ownership and land dispute (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. defendants' claims regarding forged documents (Para 6 , 7)
3. trial court's findings and decisions (Para 8 , 10 , 14)
4. appellate court's reversal of trial court decisions (Para 9 , 16 , 17)
5. court's directive for remand and re-examination (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT

1. This is an appeal under Section 100 of the CPC, 1908 against the impugned Judgment & Decree dated 12.09.2018, passed by the learned District Judge, Unakoti Judicial District Kailashahar, in Title Appeal 3 of 2016, whereby learned District Judge, Unakoti Judicial District, Kailashahar, reversed the Judgment & Decree dated 30.09.2013 & 01.10.2013 respectively, passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kailashahar, North Tripura District Judiciary in Title Suit No.23 of 2011.

2. The short of the plaintiffs' case (the appellants herein) is that the land measuring 0.791 acres of khatian no.4940 under Kailashahar mouja pertaining to Old C.S Plot No.7398(p) corresponding to R.S. Plot No. 7180 totaling land measuring 0.426 acres and pertaining to CS Plot No. 7403 corresponding to RS Plot No.7186 totaling land measuring 0.365 described in the 1st schedule in the suit land of this suit. The land measuring 0.100 acres described in 2nd schedule was sold to plaintiff nos.6 and 7 by plaintiff no.s 1 to 5 and their deceased mother Maya Rani Malakar. The land measuring 0.691 acres described in 3rd schedule is the remaining land in the hand of plaintiff nos. 1 to 5. The plaintiff nos. 1 to 5 are the sole and ultimate legal heirs of their deceased parents Jitendra Chandra Malakar.

3. Originally the suit land along with other land was owned and possessed by one Jogendra Chandra Malakar on the strength of auction purchase vides auction certificate case No.113 of 1345 T.E issued by competent authority of then Govt. of Tripura. The said Jogendra Chandra Malakar died leaving behind him 3 sons namely (1) Jotindra Chandra Malakar, (2) Jitendra Chandra Malakar, (3) Digendra Chandra Malakar, and two daughters namely - (1) Pravashini Malakar and (2) Raj Moni Malakar. On the death of said Jogendra Chandra Malakar, his above said legal heirs became sole owners of the suit land and other land left by him. The two daughters of deceased Jogendra Chandra Malakar gifted their shares of the land including suit land left by Jogendra Chandra Malakar to their three sons of Jogendra Chandra Malakar executed and effected regular partition of the land left by their father amongst themselves vides Registered partition deed No. 1-1436 dated 16.05.1983. In that partition, the suit land along with other land fell to the exclusive share of Jitendra Chandra Malakar and on his death the present plaintiff Nos. 1 to 5 being daughters and sons became exclusive owners and possessors of the suit land and other land.

4. Thereafter, Smt. Aparna Malakar and 6 (six) others have filed the suit against Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Kailashahar Sub-Division, Unakoti District & 2(two) others for declaration of right, title and interest and confirmation of possession over suit land.

5. The appellant filed the suit in the trial court for recovering of possession of the following schedules.

1st Schedule (suit land)

District-north Tripura PS Kailashahar, Tehshil - Kailashahar. Mouja - Kailashahar, Khatian No 4940.

I) Old C.S Plot No. 7398/(part) (corresponding R.S Plot No. 7180, Class- Nal, Area - 0.426 acres.

II) Old C.S Plot No. 7403 Corresponding RS Plot No. 7186, Class-Nal , Area- 0.365 Acre.

Total land area = 0.791 acre.

2nd Schedule (Sold out land)

District- P.S Tehshil- Mouja- Kailashahar, Khatian No. 4940, Old CS Plot No. 7403(part) Corresponding R.S Plot NO. 7186 (part), at the south-western portion of plot. Class-Nal, Area- 0.100 Ac. Begin bounded as below-

North- Land of plaintiff nos, 1/2/3/4/5

South- Land of plaintiff nos, 1/2/3/4/5

East- Land of plaintiff nos, 1/2/3/4/5

West- late kunjabihari Barma & late Bilash Moni Chakrabo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top