SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 6

S. TALAPATRA
Milan Chandra Kar – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
P. Majumder and S. Debbarma, Advocates, for the Appellant; D. Bhattacharjee, GA and S. Deb, Advocate, for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

S. Talapatra, J. - Being aggrieved by the action of the police, the petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India urging direction on the respondents to keep complaints of the petitioner dated 13.09.2020 (Annexure-1 to the writ petition) and dated 20.08.2021 (Annexure-6 to the writ petition) filed before Officer in Charge of RK Pur police station (reproduced with accuracy). In short, non registration of the FIR on the basis of the said complaint has aggrieved the petitioner.

2. According to the petitioner, the said complaint clearly discloses cognizable offence and despite that position, no case was registered against the accused persons. The police, without registering a case for commission of the offence as disclosed by the said complaint (Annexure-1 to the writ petition), entered the substance of the said complaint in the station diary vide RK Pur Police Station GDE No. 22 dated 20.08.2021 and thereafter, the police submitted a prosecution report (PR, for short) vide No. RK Pur PS PR No. 197 dated 03/09/2021 under Section 107 of the Cr.P.C. According to the petitioner, the said act is not only unfair on the part of the police but an act in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top