SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 11

T. AMARNATH GOUD
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Rahimun Nessa – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. P. Gautam, Advocate, for the Appellant; None, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

This appeal has been filed under Section 173 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988, read with Section 168 of the Act ibid, against the impugned judgment and award dated 10.06.2020 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Unakoti Judicial District Kailashahar, in Case No. T.S.(MAC) No.08 of 2019.

2. The brief facts are that, on 23.12.2015, at about 7.00 hours, the deceased-Tayab Ali proceeded from his residence to Kailashahar town boarding on the offending vehicle (Auto-rickshaw) bearing registration No. TR.02-B-3496. When the said vehicle reached near Kubjar, the said auto rickshaw capsized due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver. As a result of said accident, Tayab Ali sustained severe injuries, and immediately he was shifted to RGM Hospital where he succumbed to his injuries.

3. The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., which is a Government of India undertaking was impleaded as the insurer of the vehicle bearing registration No.TR-02-B-3496 (Auto Rickshaw) in the claim petition filed by the claimant-respondents under Section 166 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988, in the case No.T.S. (MAC) No. 08 of 2019 claiming compensation of Rs.32,40,000/- for the death of Ta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top