SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Tri) 300

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
T. Amarnath Goud, J.
Oil And Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Bishirai Debbarma & Ors. - Respondents
CRP 18 of 2021
Decided On : 25-03-2022

Advocates appeared:
S.M. Chakraborty, Sr. Adv. and R. Dasgupta, Advocate, for the Appellant; P. Gautam and Raju Datta, Advocates, for the Respondents

Compensation for land use under the Petroleum & Minerals Pipelines Act requires proper documentation for valuation; the absence of such documentation impacts the awarded amount.

Headnote:(A) Petroleum & Minerals Pipelines Act, 1962 - Compensation determination - Petitioner claimed compensation amounting to Rs. 90,00,000/- for business disruption due to land acquisition by respondents - Lower court awarded Rs. 62,85,600/- as compensation for loss but neglected land value due to lack of documentation - Court reaffirmed the right to compensation under Section 10 of the Act, asserting the need for proper assessment including land value. (Paras 12, 15, 23)

(B) Jurisdiction and Limitation - The petitioners argued against the jurisdiction and timeliness of the claim. The court found no documents supporting the claim of limitation and upheld the lower court's authority. (Paras 19, 21)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a landowner, operated a sand quarry disrupted by the laying of a gas pipeline. He sought compensation for loss of business estimated at Rs. 90,00,000/- based on local land value; however, he received Rs. 62,85,600/- after the competent authority's determination was contested, citing inadequate documentation for land valuation.

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the lower court's compensation award while noting the absence of evidence to assign value to the land. The court confirmed the award of Rs. 62,85,600/- for business losses but stated that land value was unsupported by relevant documents.

Issues: The primary issues included whether the compensation was adequately determined as per law and whether the petitioner's claims regarding land value and earnings were substantiated.

Ratio Decidendi: The judgment confirmed that compensation must adequately reflect the claimant's loss, emphasizing the need for proper documentation in determining land value per the Act. It found no basis for the petitioners' jurisdictional and limitation claims, validating the earlier compensation assessment.

Result: The civil revision petition stands dismissed, affirming the lower court's order.

Table of Content
1. application filed for compensation review. (Para 1)
2. claimant's business damages and compensation sought. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. opposition's objections on compensation validity. (Para 5 , 6)
4. issues framed for determination. (Para 7)
5. evidence and documents presented by claimant. (Para 8 , 9)
6. examination of loss calculation methodology. (Para 10 , 11)
7. court's findings on compensation assessment. (Para 12 , 13 , 15)
8. market value determination as per legislation. (Para 14)
9. compensation awarded and conditions for deduction. (Para 16)
10. arguments on jurisdiction and limitation, dismissed. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
11. final dismissal of civil revision petition. (Para 22 , 23)

JUDGMENT

T. Amarnath Goud, J. - This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the judgment dated 07.05.2019 passed in Civil Misc (PMP) 23 of 2014 between Sri Bishirai Debbarma, Claimant-petitioner and the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited and 3 others, whereby and whereunder the learned Additional District Judge, West Tripura, Agartala fixed compensation for damage to the business of sand quarry and earning and compensation amounting to Rs. 62,85,600 only. The petitioners also preferred this application for exercising the supervisory jurisdiction of the Hon'ble High Court against the Order passed by the learned Additional District Judge, West Tripura, Agartala in Civil Misc (PMP) 23 of 2014 between Sri Bishirai Debbarma claimant-petitioner and the Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Limited and 3 other respondents, whereby and whereunder the learned Addl. District Judge, West Tripura, Agartala fixed compensation for damage to the business of sand quarry and earning amounting to Rs. 62,85,600/- (Rupees sixty two lakh eighty five thousand six hundred) only in violation of the provisions of Petroleum & Minerals Pipelines Act, 1962 (P&MP Act, 1962) and the Petroleum & Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Rules, 1962.

2. For the sake of brevity the parties are referred to as in the cause title of Civil Misc.(PMP) 23 of 2014. Brief facts of the present case are that the claimant is the owner and possessor of Land measuring 0.43 acres in plot no. 4710(P) & 4710/9989(P) pertaining to Khatian No. 1790 of Mouja-Sreenagar whereon he used to draw sandy water from river namely 'Bankshwar Harun'. The Claimant-petitioner used to draw sandy water from the said river and the water used to fell in the said land by 6 pump set (sand extracting Machine) and thereby the Claimant petitioner used to collect sand from the sandy water and that the petitioner has set one pump set (sand extracting Machine) for the said work and that for collection of sand the claimant petitioner has to employ 4 laborer per day pump set and hence the petitioner has to engage 24 laborer for carrying out the sand collection and heap the sand in the said land which became as sand quarry. The petitioner also stated in his petition that the claimant petitioner used to pay Rs. 500/- per day for hiring a pump set (Sand extracting machine) and 6 ltrs of diesel per day was required for running the said pump set. The claimant petitioner used to produce 42 to 43 trucks of sand per day which cost is estimated at Rs. 750/- per truck. The claimant stated that the respondent No. 4 by issuing a notice to the claimant petitioner stated that his land mentioned herein above was required in public interest for transmitting of Natural Gas for the Thermal Project in Palatana, Udaipur-South Tripura pipe lines will be laid down. It is also stated in that notice that the claimant petitioner will not be allowed to construct building, or construct or excavate or reservoir etc or in any form of plant trees or garden and right of user shall absolutely vest with the Govt. of India. The Respondent No. 4 caused a Field inquiry through competent authorities on behalf of the respondents and thereafter the field inquiry report was submitted to respondents.

3.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top